Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE6_FNC-7.2 Topic 1 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FNC-7.2 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 1
[All NSE6_FNC-7.2 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

If you are forcing the registration of unknown (rogue) hosts, and an unknown (rogue) host connects to a port on the switch, what occurs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Study Guide p. 356: Any time FortiNAC changes network access for an endpoint, the change is documented on the Port Changes view. This provides an administrator with valuable information when validating control configurations and enforcement.

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lashaun
1 months ago
Option D, disabling the host? What is this, the Dark Ages? I want my switches to be smart, not heavy-handed. Give me that isolation VLAN any day - B is the way to go, my friend.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
1 months ago
Alright, let's see here... If it's an unknown host, I'd expect the switch to take some action to isolate it. So I'm going to go with B, the default isolation VLAN. Seems like the most logical choice to me.
upvoted 0 times
Jeffrey
1 days ago
Default isolation VLAN seems like the right choice for handling unknown hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
15 days ago
I think the switch will move the host to a default isolation VLAN as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
17 days ago
I agree, isolating the unknown host in a default VLAN makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tamie
1 months ago
Ha! Disabling the host? That's a bit extreme, don't you think? I'd go with B, moving the host to an isolation VLAN. Keeps things nice and secure without shutting down the connection entirely.
upvoted 0 times
Edgar
16 days ago
User1: Exactly, no need to completely disable the host.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theodora
1 months ago
User2: Definitely, it's a good balance between security and functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivienne
1 months ago
User1: I agree, isolating the host seems like a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rasheeda
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I guess it depends on how the switch is configured. Maybe the host gets moved to a specific VLAN or maybe it gets disabled. I'll have to think about this one a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
Delmy
8 days ago
C) No VLAN change is performed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
1 months ago
B) The host is moved to a default isolation VLAN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lura
1 months ago
A) The host is moved to VLAN 111.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosalia
2 months ago
The question seems straightforward. If an unknown host connects, it should be moved to an isolation VLAN, so I think B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
Soledad
15 days ago
You're right, it's better to isolate than to disable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aretha
1 months ago
I think that would be too extreme, just moving it to an isolation VLAN should be enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
2 months ago
But what if the host is disabled instead?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherri
2 months ago
I agree, B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bettyann
2 months ago
I think no VLAN change is performed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
2 months ago
I believe the host is moved to a default isolation VLAN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
2 months ago
I think the host is moved to VLAN 111.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77