Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam FCSS_SOC_AN-7.4 Topic 4 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's FCSS_SOC_AN-7.4 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 4
[All FCSS_SOC_AN-7.4 Questions]

Refer to the exhibits.

You configured a custom event handler and an associated rule to generate events whenever FortiMail detects spam emails. However, you notice that the event handler is generating events for both spam emails and clean emails.

Which change must you make in the rule so that it detects only spam emails?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Overview of Automation Stitches: Automation stitches in Fortinet solutions enable automated responses to specific events detected within the network. This automation helps in swiftly mitigating threats without manual intervention.

FortiGate Security Profiles:

FortiGate uses security profiles to enforce policies on network traffic. These profiles can include antivirus, web filtering, intrusion prevention, and more.

When a security profile detects a violation or a specific event, it can trigger predefined actions.

Webhook Calls:

FortiGate can be configured to send webhook calls upon detecting specific security events.

A webhook is an HTTP callback triggered by an event, sending data to a specified URL. This allows FortiGate to communicate with other systems, such as FortiAnalyzer.

FortiAnalyzer Integration:

FortiAnalyzer collects logs and events from various Fortinet devices, providing centralized logging and analysis.

Upon receiving a webhook call from FortiGate, FortiAnalyzer can further analyze the event, generate reports, and take automated actions if configured to do so.

Detailed Process:

Step 1: A security profile on FortiGate triggers a violation based on the defined security policies.

Step 2: FortiGate sends a webhook call to FortiAnalyzer with details of the violation.

Step 3: FortiAnalyzer receives the webhook call and logs the event.

Step 4: Depending on the configuration, FortiAnalyzer can execute an automation stitch to respond to the event, such as sending alerts, generating reports, or triggering further actions.


Fortinet Documentation: FortiOS Automation Stitches

FortiAnalyzer Administration Guide: Details on configuring event handlers and integrating with FortiGate.

FortiGate Administration Guide: Information on security profiles and webhook configurations.

By understanding the interaction between FortiGate and FortiAnalyzer through webhook calls and automation stitches, security operations can ensure a proactive and efficient response to security events.

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lauryn
1 months ago
Ah, the classic 'spam or not spam' conundrum. I bet the exam writers had a good laugh coming up with this one. Anyways, B is the answer, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Dominga
15 days ago
Yeah, B makes the most sense in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zachary
18 days ago
I agree, B seems to be the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
30 days ago
I think B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Estrella
2 months ago
I think D is overkill for this task. Why bother with a group-based filter when we can just target the spam logs directly? B is the clear winner.
upvoted 0 times
Jennifer
5 days ago
Yeah, B is definitely the way to go. No need to complicate things with option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carrol
14 days ago
I think B is the best choice too. It specifically targets spam logs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenise
18 days ago
I agree, B seems like the most straightforward option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gail
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about C. Disabling the rule doesn't seem like the right approach here. Let's go with B to keep things simple.
upvoted 0 times
Jutta
18 days ago
Great, let's update the rule with that change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
1 months ago
That makes sense, let's go with B then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucia
1 months ago
Agreed, selecting type==spam in the Log filter by Text field should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evelynn
2 months ago
I think B is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keshia
2 months ago
Option B is the way to go! Filtering the logs by the 'type==spam' field is the most straightforward solution to this problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
2 months ago
Hmm, I see your point. But I still think option A is the best choice because it specifically mentions Anti-Spam Log.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) In the Log filter by Text field, type type==spam.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamekia
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) In the Log Type field, select Anti-Spam Log (spam).
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77