Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam FCP_FML_AD-7.4 Topic 2 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's FCP_FML_AD-7.4 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 2
[All FCP_FML_AD-7.4 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit, which shows a partial antispam profile configuration.

What will happen to an email that triggers Spam outbreak protection?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Annamaria
17 hours ago
I'm going with Option C. Holding the email in a deferred queue gives the system time to do its magic and figure out if it's really spam or just your grandma's famous fruitcake recipe. Gotta love those bureaucratic delays!
upvoted 0 times
...
King
2 days ago
Aw, man, I was hoping for a trick question. You know, something like 'The email is transported to an alternate dimension where it becomes sentient and starts a revolution against the spam filter overlords.' But alas, it's just a good old-fashioned spam outbreak. Option B it is!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sonia
8 days ago
D? Really? Marking the email as clean and releasing it to the recipient? That's like handing a grenade to a toddler. Option B is the clear winner here, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
11 days ago
I think C is the correct answer. Holding the email in a deferred queue gives the system time to analyze the situation and decide how to handle it properly. Gotta love that attention to detail!
upvoted 0 times
Chaya
2 days ago
I agree, C seems like the most logical choice. It allows for further analysis before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margurite
1 months ago
That could be a possibility too, depending on the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
1 months ago
But what if the email is marked as clean and released?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
1 months ago
I believe the email will be held in a deferred queue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
1 months ago
Option B, of course! Rejecting the email is the best way to handle a spam outbreak. Let's not waste time with all that logging and deferred queue nonsense.
upvoted 0 times
In
16 hours ago
But what if the email is not actually spam? Wouldn't it be better to log it for review?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
1 months ago
I agree, rejecting the email is the most efficient way to handle a spam outbreak.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dana
1 months ago
I think the email will be rejected.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77