Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Finra Exam Series-6 Topic 4 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for Finra's Series-6 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 4
[All Series-6 Questions]

: 202

Sarah Bean is a registered representative with NewWave Investments, a family of mutual funds. She has recommended one of NewWave's funds to a client and given him a prospectus. The prospectus provides information about the fund's breakpoints and indicates that an investment of $25,000 or more will lead to a reduced front-end load. The prospectus also clearly explains the details of a letter of intent. Sarah's client invests $23,000 in the fund then and there without even opening the prospectus.

Has Sarah violated any of FINRA's rules of conduct?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Among other things, the trade confirmation that Anna receives must stipulate the items described in Selections I and III only. The trade confirmation that Anna receives from GetErDone must stipulate the time and date of the transaction, the number of shares sold, and the price at which they were sold. The exchange or ECN on which the transaction was executed is not provided on the confirmation statement. Whether GetErDone acted as a principal or a broker in the transaction does need to be stipulated, but in this instance GetErDone acted as a broker, not a principal. GetErDone did not itself buy the shares from Anna.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Annice
13 days ago
C) Yes. Sarah needed to tell her client that he would have to read through the prospectus to ensure he understood all aspects of the investment before she could take any money from him.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
13 days ago
Ooh, this is a tricky one. I think C is the right answer - Sarah should have made the client read the prospectus before taking any money. Can't just assume they'll figure it out on their own.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karima
14 days ago
A) No. Sarah properly provided her client with a prospectus prior to selling him shares of the fund.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
17 days ago
B) Yes. Sarah is required to explain the concepts of breakpoints and letters of intent to her client.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
17 days ago
I agree with Gary. Sarah can't just hand the prospectus over and expect the client to read it thoroughly. She needs to walk them through the key points, especially when it could impact the fees they pay.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gary
18 days ago
Hmm, I think Sarah should have explained the breakpoints and letter of intent details to her client. Even if the prospectus had the information, she has a duty to make sure the client understands it.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77