Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Finra Exam Series-6 Topic 10 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Finra's Series-6 exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 10
[All Series-6 Questions]

The AGRO Mutual Fund invests in aggressive growth stocks of midcap corporations. The fund is running an advertisement on the radio that informs the listeners that AGRO earned a 22% return last year while the S&P 500 Index returned only 10%. The ad also contains information regarding how an interested investor can contain a fund prospectus.

Has AGRO violated any securities laws with this advertisement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Neither Class B nor Class C shares have front-end loads. Class B and Class C shares typically have higher 12b -1 fees, however, with Class C having the highest 12b-1 fees of the three classes.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Kristofer
1 months ago
Wait, did AGRO use the word 'only' when describing the S&P 500's return? That's a bit cheeky, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
Felix
4 days ago
C) Yes. Although AGRO provided the return on the S&P 500 as well as its own return, the S&P 500 Index is comprised of average risk stocks and is not an appropriate benchmark for AGRO to use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
10 days ago
B) No. In addition to providing the listeners with its own return last year, AGRO appropriately provided the listeners with a benchmark return; thus there has been no violation of any laws.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
18 days ago
A) No. This would be considered a generic advertisement and not an offer to sell.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chaya
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards option A. It's just a generic advertisement, not an offer to sell, so I don't see any issues with it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chara
1 months ago
Haha, option D is a bit too much, isn't it? AGRO isn't required to give a detailed breakdown of its investments, that would be overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keshia
1 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. Option C seems more plausible to me. The S&P 500 is not an appropriate benchmark for an aggressive growth fund like AGRO.
upvoted 0 times
Nieves
16 hours ago
Option C seems more plausible to me. The S&P 500 is not an appropriate benchmark for an aggressive growth fund like AGRO.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Roy
2 months ago
I think option B is correct. AGRO provided the listeners with its own return as well as a benchmark, which is a standard practice in the industry.
upvoted 0 times
Derick
29 days ago
I think the advertisement was informative and transparent. Option B is definitely the correct answer in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
1 months ago
It's important for investors to have that comparison with a benchmark like the S&P 500. AGRO did the right thing by including that information in their advertisement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
1 months ago
I agree, option B seems to be the right choice. AGRO did not violate any securities laws by providing both its return and a benchmark.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Coleen
2 months ago
A) No. It's just a generic advertisement, no violation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
2 months ago
C) Yes. S&P 500 is not an appropriate benchmark for AGRO.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
3 months ago
B) No. AGRO provided a benchmark return, so it's not a violation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77