Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks Exam 301b Topic 5 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301b exam
Question #: 104
Topic #: 5
[All 301b Questions]

The active LTM device in a high-availability (HA) pair performs a failover at the same time the network team reports an outage of a switch on the network.

Which two items could have caused the failover event? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Nichelle at Dec 09, 2024, 11:19 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 301b Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Erick
1 months ago
I bet the network team was just trying to distract the LTM team so they could have a coffee break. That's the real reason for the 'outage', am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Bulah
5 days ago
E) the standby LTM that lost connectivity on the failover VLAN
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
7 days ago
B) a monitor on a pool in an HA group
upvoted 0 times
...
Silvana
15 days ago
A) a VLAN fail-safe setting
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Yuette
1 months ago
A VLAN fail-safe setting (option A) sounds like it could be a valid answer, but I'm pretty sure that's not what they're looking for here. Maybe the network team should have tried turning it off and on again before calling it in.
upvoted 0 times
Natalie
3 days ago
E) the standby LTM that lost connectivity on the failover VLAN
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
5 days ago
B) a monitor on a pool in an HA group
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jessenia
2 months ago
I'm not sure how an Auditor role with GUI access (option D) could cause a failover, unless they accidentally pushed the big red button or something. That's a bit of a stretch if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
Derick
18 days ago
B) a monitor on a pool in an HA group
upvoted 0 times
...
Caren
1 months ago
A) a VLAN fail-safe setting
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Luisa
2 months ago
Rebooting the standby LTM (option C) could also trigger a failover, but that's not one of the two correct answers. Maybe the network team should have checked the failover VLAN before reporting the switch outage.
upvoted 0 times
Johnathon
15 days ago
E) the standby LTM that lost connectivity on the failover VLAN
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
17 days ago
B) a monitor on a pool in an HA group
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
1 months ago
A) a VLAN fail-safe setting
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Becky
2 months ago
The failover event could be caused by a monitor on a pool in an HA group or the standby LTM losing connectivity on the failover VLAN. Looks like options B and E are the correct answers here.
upvoted 0 times
Cherry
27 days ago
Yes, and it could also be because the standby LTM lost connectivity on the failover VLAN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Berry
1 months ago
I think the failover could have been caused by the monitor on a pool in an HA group.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Royal
2 months ago
I believe it could also be because the standby LTM lost connectivity on the failover VLAN.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
2 months ago
I agree with you, Shonda. It's possible that the failover was triggered by a monitor on a pool in an HA group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
3 months ago
I think the failover could have been caused by the VLAN fail-safe setting.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77