Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks Exam 301b Topic 2 Question 96 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301b exam
Question #: 96
Topic #: 2
[All 301b Questions]

-- Exhibit --

-- Exhibit --

Refer to the exhibit.

Which profile could be removed or changed on this virtual server to reduce CPU load on the LTM device without increasing server side bandwidth usage?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Cathern
24 days ago
Hey, I got an idea! Why don't we just overclock the LTM device? That'll show that CPU who's boss. Then we can crank up all the profiles to the max and let the server take a break. Problem solved, baby!
upvoted 0 times
Lavonne
11 days ago
C) httpcompression
upvoted 0 times
...
Mose
12 days ago
B) http
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
16 days ago
A) tcp
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Christiane
27 days ago
Whoa, hold up! What if we just unplug the whole LTM device and let the server handle it all? That's gotta be the ultimate CPU-saver, right? I mean, who needs load balancing when you've got pure server power!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nikita
28 days ago
Hmm, let me think... I'd say the HTTP profile. Why? Because if you remove it, the LTM won't have to deal with all those pesky HTTP headers and whatnot. Plus, the server can just spit out raw data. Boom, CPU load reduced!
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
29 days ago
Dude, this is easy. It's gotta be the TCP profile. I mean, who needs all that fancy HTTP stuff when you can just strip it down to the bare essentials, right? Less processing, less CPU load. Simple as that!
upvoted 0 times
Beth
5 days ago
I see your point, but optimized-caching could also be a good choice to reduce CPU load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zona
8 days ago
But what about HTTP compression? Wouldn't that help reduce CPU load as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
15 days ago
I think you're right, TCP profile seems like the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lorriane
2 months ago
Ooh, a trick question! I bet it's the optimized-caching profile. Reduce the CPU load by letting the LTM handle the caching, and the server doesn't have to work harder. Yeah, that's the one!
upvoted 0 times
Laine
22 days ago
I see your point, but I still think optimized-caching is the better option in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
28 days ago
But what about httpcompression? Wouldn't that also help in reducing CPU load?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosio
1 months ago
I think you're right, optimized-caching would be the best choice to reduce CPU load.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherri
2 months ago
Hmm, let's see. If we want to reduce the CPU load on the LTM device without increasing server-side bandwidth usage, I'd say the HTTP compression profile is the way to go. Less processing on the LTM, and the server doesn't have to work harder. Seems like a win-win to me!
upvoted 0 times
Carlota
7 days ago
That's a good point, optimized caching could also be a good option to consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andrew
8 days ago
But wouldn't optimizing caching also help in reducing the CPU load without increasing server-side bandwidth usage?
upvoted 0 times
...
Thad
1 months ago
I think you're right, HTTP compression profile would definitely help reduce CPU load on the LTM device.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glenn
2 months ago
But what about optimized-caching? Wouldn't removing that profile also help in reducing CPU load?
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
2 months ago
I agree with Jerilyn. Removing httpcompression could reduce CPU load without increasing server side bandwidth usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerilyn
3 months ago
I think the profile that could be removed is httpcompression.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77