Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks Exam 301a Topic 8 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 301a exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 8
[All 301a Questions]

An LTM Specialist needs to provide access to a 8BG-IP to device for a company's support person access to the BIG IP device, but are NOT allowed to change any settings All support the support remote access to the BIG-IP device, but are NOT allowed to change ant settings. All support have accounts in the company's Active Directory

Which method is appropriate to provide access for the support personnel to the BIG-JP device?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

It is required that cookie persist must be used and http profile must be used, and SSL offloading must also be required. It must be in standard mode, excluding BD E.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Hey, at least they're not asking for the 'Demolition Specialist' user role. That would be a real BIG-IP problem!
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
3 days ago
Operator role? That's like giving a kid the keys to the candy store. Option B all the way, keep those support folks on a tight leash!
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
8 days ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. What if we need the support personnel to do more than just view? Maybe Option C with the Operator user role would be better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
11 days ago
I agree with Pete. Option B is the way to go here. Guest user role is perfect for this scenario where we want to provide access without any changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
15 days ago
Option B seems the most appropriate. Mapping the support personnel to the Guest user role ensures they can access the BIG-IP device without the ability to change any settings.
upvoted 0 times
Chauncey
4 days ago
I agree, option B is the best choice for providing access to the support personnel.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Malcom
16 days ago
That's a good point, but I still think option B is better because it restricts the support personnel from making any changes to the settings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
21 days ago
I disagree, I believe option C is more appropriate as it maps the support personnel users to the Operator user role, which gives them more access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
24 days ago
I think option B is the best choice because it specifically maps the support personnel users to the Guest user role.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77