F5 Networks Exam 201 Topic 8 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 201 exam

Question #: 77
Topic #: 8

[All 201 Questions]

A node is a member of various pools and hosts different web applications. If a web application is unavailable, the BIG-IP appliance needs to mark the pool member down for that application pool. What should a BIG-IP Administrator deploy at the pool level to accomplish this?

AA UDP monitor with a custom interval/timeout

BA combination of ICMP + TCP monitor

CAn HTTP monitor with custom send/receive strings

DA TCP monitor with a custom interval/timeout

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Nelida at Nov 21, 2023, 07:41 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Dottie

1 months ago

I don't know, but I'm sure the correct answer involves a lot of acronyms and technical jargon. Just the way I like it!

upvoted 0 times

Sharika

3 days ago

User 2: I believe it's D) A TCP monitor with a custom interval/timeout.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zita

7 days ago

User 1: I think the answer is C) An HTTP monitor with custom send/receive strings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tarra

2 months ago

Option A is a bit strange. Using a UDP monitor for a web application? That's like using a carrier pigeon to check your email.

upvoted 0 times

Jestine

8 days ago

User 3: It's like using a carrier pigeon to check your email.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

14 days ago

User 2: Yeah, using a UDP monitor for a web application seems odd.

upvoted 0 times

...

Trina

16 days ago

User 1: I think option A is a bit strange.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carrol

2 months ago

I'm going with B. A combination of ICMP and TCP monitors can check both the network connectivity and the application-level availability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hoa

2 months ago

D sounds good to me. A TCP monitor with a custom interval and timeout should be able to detect if the pool member is down.

upvoted 0 times

Pete

4 days ago

User 4: Let's go with option D then, it seems like the most reliable choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dustin

7 days ago

User 3: That makes sense, it would be able to detect if the pool member is down.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elenora

28 days ago

User 2: I agree, a TCP monitor with custom settings should work well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hyman

1 months ago

User 1: I think D is the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eugene

2 months ago

I think C is the correct answer. An HTTP monitor with custom send/receive strings can check the availability of the web application directly.

upvoted 0 times

Yasuko

24 days ago

User 2: I agree, an HTTP monitor with custom send/receive strings can directly check the availability of the web application.

upvoted 0 times

...

Boris

27 days ago

User 1: I think C is the correct answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adela

28 days ago

I think D could also work, a TCP monitor with custom settings could do the job.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesus

1 months ago

I agree, C seems like the best option to monitor the web application availability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonard

2 months ago

I'm not sure about that. I think D) A TCP monitor with a custom interval/timeout could also work to mark the pool member down if the web application is unavailable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonora

2 months ago

I agree with Susy. An HTTP monitor would be able to check if the web application is available by sending specific requests and receiving expected responses.

upvoted 0 times

...

Susy

2 months ago

I think the correct answer is C) An HTTP monitor with custom send/receive strings.

upvoted 0 times

...