Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

F5 Networks Exam 201 Topic 4 Question 88 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 201 exam
Question #: 88
Topic #: 4
[All 201 Questions]

A 816-IP Administrator recently deployed an application Users are experiencing slow performance with

the application on some remote networks.

Which two modifications can the BIG-IP Administrator make to address this issue? (Choose two)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Haley at May 23, 2024, 12:36 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
France
1 months ago
Maybe the users are just really, really far away from the server, like on the moon or something. In that case, the admin should just install a catapult to launch the data packets there faster.
upvoted 0 times
Sanda
7 days ago
B: Yeah, that could definitely help with the slow performance on remote networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
16 days ago
A: I think applying the f5-tcp-wan profile to the Virtual Server could help improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jutta
1 months ago
A) Applying a dest addr profile? Isn't that like trying to put out a fire with gasoline? I'm sticking with B) and C) for this one.
upvoted 0 times
Janey
9 days ago
Let's go ahead and make those modifications to the Virtual Server.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
22 days ago
I agree, those profiles should help improve performance on remote networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adria
23 days ago
I think B) Apply f5-tcp-wan profile and C) Apply f5-tcp-lan profile are the best options.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shakira
2 months ago
E) fasti_4 profile? Sounds like some kind of exotic spice blend, not a network configuration. I'll have to pass on that one.
upvoted 0 times
Tiffiny
15 days ago
Merilyn: Good point, let's give those a try before considering the fasti_4 profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
16 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that could definitely improve things. Maybe also applying the dest addr profile could make a difference.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlton
1 months ago
User 1: I think applying the f5-tcp-wan profile might help with the slow performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marti
2 months ago
I'm not sure about the profiles, but maybe checking the dest addr profile could also be a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
2 months ago
I agree with Krissy, but also applying f5-tcp-lan profile might improve the performance on remote networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marleen
2 months ago
I'm not sure about D) - applying a source_addr profile doesn't seem relevant to the problem at hand. Maybe the question is trying to trick us?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
2 months ago
B) and C) seem like the most logical choices to address the slow performance on remote networks. The f5-tcp-wan and f5-tcp-lan profiles are designed for optimizing TCP traffic over WAN and LAN connections, respectively.
upvoted 0 times
Armanda
16 days ago
Hopefully applying those profiles will improve the performance for users on remote networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
1 months ago
I agree, those profiles are specifically designed to optimize traffic over WAN and LAN connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mira
2 months ago
C) Apply f5-tcp-lan profile to the Virtual Server
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
2 months ago
B) Apply f5-tcp-wan profile to the Virtual Server
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Krissy
3 months ago
I think applying f5-tcp-wan profile could help with the slow performance issue.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77