F5 Networks Exam 201 Topic 2 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 201 exam

Question #: 78
Topic #: 2

[All 201 Questions]

A BIG-IP Administrator finds the following log entry:

tnm tmm[7141]: 011e0002:4: sweeperjjpdate: aggressive mode activated.

Which action should the BIG-IP Administrator to mitigate this memory issue?

AConfigure the redundant par to be active-active

BDecrease the TCP profile ide Timeout value

Cincrease the TCP profile ide Timeout value

DConfigure the serve to use Connection Mirroring

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Shenika at Dec 10, 2023, 08:40 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Cassi

1 months ago

Aggressive mode activated, huh? Sounds like the BIG-IP is channeling its inner Bruce Lee. Maybe we should just let it do its thing and see what happens. Or, you know, go with C and keep it chill.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hayley

1 months ago

Increasing the TCP profile idle Timeout value? Sounds like a recipe for a BIG-IP nap time. But hey, if it works, I'm all for it. C is my pick.

upvoted 0 times

Salena

1 days ago

Let's go with option C then, increase the TCP profile idle Timeout value.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jackie

2 days ago

I agree, it could give the system more time to handle connections before timing out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Patrick

14 days ago

I think increasing the TCP profile idle Timeout value might help with the memory issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lewis

1 months ago

Ah, the dreaded sweeperjjpdate. I bet the BIG-IP Administrator is sweeping the floor with this one. C is the way to go, no doubt about it.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sherman

1 months ago

Wow, that's a tricky one. Aggressive mode activated? Sounds like a job for the BIG-IP Ninja! I'm going with C, just to keep things calm and collected.

upvoted 0 times

Nicolette

8 days ago

User 3: Let's hope it works and keeps things running smoothly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Casey

17 days ago

User 2: Agreed, that sounds like a good plan to mitigate the memory issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aleisha

1 months ago

User 1: I think we should go with option C to increase the TCP profile ide Timeout value.

upvoted 0 times

...

Galen

2 months ago

Hmm, I think the answer is C. Increasing the TCP profile idle Timeout value should help mitigate the memory issue. After all, we don't want our BIG-IP to be a TCP speed demon, right?

upvoted 0 times

Barb

1 months ago

B: Yeah, that makes sense. We don't want our BIG-IP to be too aggressive with memory usage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isaac

1 months ago

A: I think the answer is C. Increasing the TCP profile idle Timeout value should help mitigate the memory issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noemi

1 months ago

B: Yeah, that makes sense. We don't want our BIG-IP to be too aggressive with memory usage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Barbra

2 months ago

A: I think the answer is C. Increasing the TCP profile idle Timeout value should help mitigate the memory issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ressie

2 months ago

Hmm, that makes sense too. Increasing the timeout value could help mitigate the memory issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gianna

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe the correct answer is C) increase the TCP profile ide Timeout value.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ressie

3 months ago

I think the answer is B) Decrease the TCP profile ide Timeout value.

upvoted 0 times

...