Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

F5 Networks Exam 201 Topic 2 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 201 exam
Question #: 68
Topic #: 2
[All 201 Questions]

A BIG-IP Administrator is performing maintenance on the active BIG-IP device of an HA pair. The BIG-IP

Administrator needs to minimize traffic disruptions.

What should the BIG-IP Administrator do to start the maintenance activity?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Carmen
29 days ago
I don't know about you, but I'd love to see the BIG-IP Administrator do a backflip while disabling the switch ports. That would make this maintenance activity way more exciting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
1 months ago
Rebooting the device (option A) is never a good idea during maintenance, unless it's absolutely necessary. That's just asking for trouble!
upvoted 0 times
Keneth
2 days ago
B) Move resources to a new Traffic Group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
6 days ago
A) Reboot the BIG-IP device.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Irma
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about disabling the switch ports (option D). That sounds a bit too extreme and could potentially cause more issues than it solves.
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
2 months ago
Option C seems like the easiest solution, but it could cause a brief outage while the device transitions to standby. I'd rather avoid that if possible.
upvoted 0 times
Patti
6 days ago
A: Let's go ahead and start by moving the resources to a new Traffic Group then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amina
10 days ago
B: Agreed, that way we can avoid any potential outage during the maintenance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandee
12 days ago
A: Let's go ahead and follow that approach to start the maintenance activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
1 months ago
B: Agreed, that way we can ensure a smooth transition without causing any outage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
1 months ago
A: I think moving resources to a new Traffic Group would be a better option to minimize disruptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deonna
1 months ago
A: I think moving resources to a new Traffic Group would be a better option to minimize disruptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ruth
2 months ago
I think option B is the best choice here. Moving resources to a new Traffic Group will allow the maintenance to be performed with minimal disruption to the active traffic.
upvoted 0 times
Dan
9 days ago
I agree, option B seems like the most efficient choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
13 days ago
Yes, forcing the BIG-IP device to standby could cause unnecessary disruptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
25 days ago
It's important to ensure minimal disruption to active traffic during maintenance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
1 months ago
Moving resources to a new Traffic Group is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
2 months ago
I agree, option B is the best choice for minimizing traffic disruptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kassandra
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think rebooting the BIG-IP device could also be a valid option to start the maintenance activity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
2 months ago
I agree with Lashawna. Moving resources to a new Traffic Group seems like the best option for minimizing disruptions during maintenance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
3 months ago
I think the BIG-IP Administrator should move resources to a new Traffic Group to minimize disruptions.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77