F5 Networks Exam 101 Topic 10 Question 70 Discussion

Actual exam question for F5 Networks's 101 exam

Question #: 70
Topic #: 10

[All 101 Questions]

What is a disadvantage of running a visualized load balancer

Amore expensive than a hardware load balancer

Bslower than a hardware load balancer

Cless reliable than a hardware load balancer

Ddoes not support high availability

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Brynn at May 24, 2024, 12:27 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Lashandra

1 months ago

Virtual load balancers? More like 'virtually useless' if you ask me. *chuckles*

upvoted 0 times

...

Elke

1 months ago

A virtual load balancer? Sounds like a waste of computing power. I'll have to go with option A on this one.

upvoted 0 times

Tamesha

12 days ago

True, but the cost can add up over time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Truman

15 days ago

But they do offer some flexibility and scalability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tasia

16 days ago

I agree, virtual load balancers can be more expensive than hardware ones.

upvoted 0 times

...

Taryn

1 months ago

Hold up, did someone say 'virtual'? I'm more of a physical kind of guy. Option B is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

Loreta

24 days ago

True, hardware load balancers are generally more reliable than virtual ones.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joanna

1 months ago

But virtual load balancers are more cost-effective than hardware ones.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dottie

1 months ago

I agree, virtual load balancers can be slower than hardware ones.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lyda

2 months ago

I'm not sure about that. Virtual load balancers can be highly available if configured properly. I'd go with option D.

upvoted 0 times

Herman

17 days ago

Virtual load balancers can be more expensive than hardware load balancers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shaunna

22 days ago

I agree, option D does not support high availability.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pura

1 months ago

I think virtual load balancers can be highly available if configured properly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Earlean

2 months ago

Option C seems like the most logical choice. Virtual load balancers are known to be less reliable than their hardware counterparts.

upvoted 0 times

Iraida

2 months ago

Yes, they are known to be slower than hardware load balancers as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merrilee

2 months ago

I agree, virtual load balancers can be less reliable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Benedict

2 months ago

But virtualized load balancers can be more flexible and scalable, so it's a trade-off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Glory

2 months ago

I agree with Alaine, cost is definitely a downside.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alaine

3 months ago

I think a disadvantage is that it's more expensive than a hardware load balancer.

upvoted 0 times

...