Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Exin Exam PDPF Topic 1 Question 81 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's PDPF exam
Question #: 81
Topic #: 1
[All PDPF Questions]

Article 33 of the GDPR deals with ''Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority''.

Paragraph 3 sets out the minimum information that must be included in this notification. Which of the below is one of these?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Yes, because the shopkeeper cannot identify the owner of the telephone. Incorrect. The issue is not whether the shopkeeper can identify the visitor, but that it is technically possible to do so.

Yes, because the visitor has automatically consented by connecting to the Wi-Fi. Incorrect. Consent must be an active, informed and free act of agreement to the processing. To see a MAC-address, the visitor does not need to be logged onto the Wi-Fi.

No, because the telephones MAC-address must be regarded as personal data. Correct. The phone's signal is a unique code that can be linked to the owner of the phone. The data must be regarded as personal data, because it is technically possible to identify the visitor. (Literature: A, Chapter 3; GDPR Article 26 and 30)

No, because the telephone providers are the owners of the MAC-addresses. Incorrect. The shopkeeper is not allowed to keep the data or process it because it must be regarded as personal data. The telephone provider is not the owner of the MAC-address, nor is the telephone provider protected by the GDPR.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Anissa
12 hours ago
I was sure B was the answer. Providing all the affected data subjects' contact details seems like the responsible thing to do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
11 days ago
A is the correct answer! The GDPR requires the notification to include the contact details of the data protection officer or another point of contact for more information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
21 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think it's important to have a clear point of contact for data protection issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryann
22 days ago
I agree with Diane, because it makes sense to have a designated contact for handling data breaches.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
25 days ago
I think the answer is A) The contact of the data protection officer or another point of contact where more information could be obtained.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77