Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Exin Exam ITSM20F.EN Topic 9 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for Exin's ITSM20F.EN exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 9
[All ITSM20F.EN Questions]

Availability and Service Continuity Plans need to be developed and reviewed periodically to ensure that requirements are met as agreed in all circumstances, from normal operations through to a major loss of service. What is the minimum level of frequency with which these Plans should be developed and reviewed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

A . Correct. A statement defined to deliver focus to the organization.

B . Incorrect. The document will record any policy statements pertinent to the obligations but not the obligations themselves.

C . Incorrect. These detail the needs of the Quality Management System, not of the policy.

D . Incorrect. These would provide input to the definition of the policies but these would not be the policies themselves.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lea
5 days ago
Joke's on them, I'm going to select C) At least bi-annually. That way, I can take a breather every six months and still meet the requirement!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
11 days ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B) and D). I guess it really comes down to the organization's needs and risk appetite. As long as it's reviewed regularly, that's what matters.
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
14 days ago
I disagree, I think the answer is C) At least bi-annually to ensure more frequent updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
16 days ago
D) In accordance with the business needs sounds more reasonable to me. The frequency should depend on the specific requirements and changes in the organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
19 days ago
I think the answer is B) At least annually. Availability and service continuity plans need to be reviewed regularly to ensure they remain relevant and effective.
upvoted 0 times
I agree, B) At least annually is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Xochitl
20 days ago
I agree with Evette, because reviewing the plans annually ensures they are up to date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
21 days ago
I think the answer is B) At least annually.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
22 days ago
I think the answer is C) At least bi-annually. We should review the plans more frequently to stay prepared for any unexpected events.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
23 days ago
I agree with Helaine. Developing and reviewing the plans annually makes sense to ensure they are up to date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
27 days ago
I think the answer is B) At least annually.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77