Esri Exam EADP19-001 Topic 8 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EADP19-001 exam

Question #: 35
Topic #: 8

An ArcGIS user wants to symbolize the intersections of highways and streets so that the road casing symbols can be blended together to represent connectivity, but not blended in other situations to represent disconnectivity (e.g. where a highway passes under a surface street)

What should be used to ensure that the road casings connect correctly?

Asymbol-level drawing with the join option

Bsymbol-level drawing with the merge option

Cmulti-layered symbol with one layer wider than the other

Dsingle layered symbol with two offset lines

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Barrett at Dec 08, 2023, 12:47 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium EADP19-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Leandro

1 months ago

Wait, are we supposed to be symbolizing the intersections or the roads themselves? I feel like I'm missing a key detail here. Ah, well, C it is!

upvoted 0 times

...

Pura

1 months ago

I'm just hoping the exam doesn't include any questions about navigating roundabouts. That's a whole other can of worms. Anyway, I'm going with C on this one.

upvoted 0 times

Kris

11 days ago

Yeah, I'm going with C too. It should help represent connectivity without blending in disconnectivity situations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josefa

17 days ago

I agree, using a multi-layered symbol seems like the best option for connecting road casings.

upvoted 0 times

...

Madalyn

26 days ago

I think C is the way to go, with one layer wider than the other.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kaycee

2 months ago

You know, I was studying for this exam while driving and almost crashed into a highway underpass. Probably should have been paying more attention to the road than the study materials. C is the answer, though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jacklyn

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm not too sure about the merge option in B. Wouldn't that just make the whole thing one big blob? I think C is the clear winner here.

upvoted 0 times

Celestina

3 days ago

I see your point, but I still think C is the best choice for ensuring the road casings connect correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeanice

9 days ago

I'm not convinced about C. I think using symbol-level drawing with the join option might be more precise.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caprice

15 days ago

I think C is the way to go as well. It will help differentiate between connectivity and disconnectivity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Derick

16 days ago

I agree, using a multi-layered symbol with one layer wider than the other would be the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Danica

2 months ago

Option C looks like the way to go. Having a multi-layered symbol with one layer wider than the other should do the trick to get those road casings to blend seamlessly.

upvoted 0 times

Darrel

25 days ago

Yes, using a multi-layered symbol with one layer wider than the other should help achieve the desired blending effect.

upvoted 0 times

...

Aileen

26 days ago

I agree, option C seems like the best choice to ensure the road casings connect correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eleonora

28 days ago

Yes, using a multi-layered symbol with one layer wider than the other should help with blending the road casings together.

upvoted 0 times

...

Wilford

1 months ago

I agree, option C seems like the best choice for ensuring the road casings connect correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marsha

2 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think option D) single layered symbol with two offset lines could also work if done correctly.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carlota

2 months ago

I agree with Katlyn, using different layers for the road casings would help show connectivity without blending in the wrong places.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katlyn

2 months ago

I think option C) multi-layered symbol with one layer wider than the other would work best.

upvoted 0 times

...