Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Esri Exam EADP19-001 Topic 5 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EADP19-001 exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 5
[All EADP19-001 Questions]

A local government geodatabase use case requires that airport noise regulation areas be deleted if a corresponding airport point Is deleted.

Assuming that one airport can contribute to only one noise regulation area, what is the appropriate way to model the requirement of this use case?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Lorean at Aug 04, 2023, 01:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium EADP19-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Carin
1 months ago
Option D is just silly. Why would you have the noise regulation areas as the origin and the airports as the destination? That's like putting the cart before the horse!
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
1 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writers are trying to trick us with these options! But Option C is definitely the correct answer. Can't have those pesky noise regulation areas hanging around without their corresponding airports.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashanti
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option B. A simple relationship class with airports as the origin and noise regulation areas as the destination would also work, right? Doesn't seem as complicated as a composite relationship.
upvoted 0 times
Nelida
10 days ago
Option B seems like the best choice. It's straightforward and should get the job done.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bernardo
1 months ago
Option C seems like the way to go. A composite relationship class with airports as the origin and noise regulation areas as the destination would ensure that the noise regulation areas are deleted whenever the corresponding airport is deleted.
upvoted 0 times
Johnetta
3 days ago
That way, deleting an airport would automatically delete the corresponding noise regulation area.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaclyn
6 days ago
It makes sense to have airports as the origin in the relationship class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
15 days ago
I agree, option C would maintain the relationship between airports and noise regulation areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fatima
2 months ago
But wouldn't it make more sense to have the airports as the origin since they are the main feature and the noise regulation areas are dependent on them?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is B) a simple relationship class with airports as the origin and noise regulation areas as the destination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) a simple relationship class with noise regulation areas as the origin and airports as the destination.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77