Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Esri Exam EADP19-001 Topic 3 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EADP19-001 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 3
[All EADP19-001 Questions]

An ArcGIS user is given a geodatabase and tasked with adding a feature class to an existing geodatabase topology. What should the user do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Joni
1 months ago
You know, I bet the person who wrote option D is the same one who comes up with those 'easy' IKEA instructions. B is the way to go, no doubt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghan
1 months ago
Wow, D really takes the cake. Remove everything and add it back? That's like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic.
upvoted 0 times
Matthew
3 days ago
C) export the existing geodatabase topology to an XML file include the feature class in the XML and import it
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
4 days ago
B) modify the existing geodatabase topology to include the feature class Explanation:-https://desktop.arcgisxom/en/arcmap/10.3/tools/data-m
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
5 days ago
A) delete the existing geodatabase topology and create a new one to include the feature class
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
24 days ago
B) modify the existing geodatabase topology to include the feature class Explanation:-https://desktop.arcgisxom/en/arcmap/10.3/tools/data-m
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentine
1 months ago
A) delete the existing geodatabase topology and create a new one to include the feature class
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jolanda
2 months ago
Haha, deleting the topology and starting over? That's like burning down the house to get rid of a spider. B is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
Sang
10 days ago
User 3: Agreed, B is definitely the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
20 days ago
User 2: Erinn is right, modifying the existing topology is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
1 months ago
User 1: Haha, deleting the whole thing seems extreme.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Trina
2 months ago
I agree, B makes the most sense. Why complicate things when you can just update the existing topology?
upvoted 0 times
Yeah, no need to make things more complicated than they need to be.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
1 days ago
I've done it before, modifying the existing topology is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
2 days ago
Agreed, deleting and recreating the whole topology seems like overkill.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
4 days ago
I think B is the best option. It's simpler to just modify the existing geodatabase topology.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matilda
5 days ago
It just makes sense to modify the existing one instead of starting from scratch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliz
13 days ago
Updating the existing topology is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
14 days ago
Agreed, deleting and creating a new one seems unnecessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
2 months ago
I think B is the best option. It's simpler to modify the existing geodatabase topology.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tammara
2 months ago
B) is the way to go. Modifying the existing topology is the easiest and most efficient option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
2 months ago
I disagree. Exporting the existing geodatabase topology to an XML file and including the feature class might be a better option for easier management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernestine
2 months ago
I agree with Delmy. It's more efficient than deleting and recreating the entire topology.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
2 months ago
I think the user should modify the existing geodatabase topology to include the feature class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think exporting the existing geodatabase topology to an XML file and including the feature class might also work.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
2 months ago
I agree with Lamonica, modifying the existing geodatabase topology seems like the most efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamonica
2 months ago
I think the user should modify the existing geodatabase topology to include the feature class.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77