Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Esri Exam EADP19-001 Topic 1 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Esri's EADP19-001 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 1
[All EADP19-001 Questions]

An ArcGlS user receives parcel data from the regional government, which is supposed to line up with parcels in the data maintained by the local government. The user is tasked with reconciling the discrepancies between the local and regional data.

In which situation are the parcel boundaries within the local data more likely to be accurate than the regional data?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Stephane
2 months ago
Option C is interesting, but I think A is the best answer. If the local government actually owns the parcel, they're going to have the most up-to-date and reliable information about it.
upvoted 0 times
Teri
6 days ago
Definitely, it's important to consider ownership when determining the accuracy of parcel data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
7 days ago
That makes sense, they would be more likely to have updated records compared to the regional government.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
16 days ago
I agree, the local government would have the most accurate information about parcels they own.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irene
25 days ago
Definitely, it's important to consider ownership when determining the accuracy of parcel data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
1 months ago
That makes sense, they would be more likely to have updated records compared to the regional government.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
1 months ago
I agree, the local government would have the most accurate information about parcels they own.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nathalie
2 months ago
Haha, these GIS questions can be tricky, but this one's a no-brainer. Of course the local data is more accurate when it shows a more recent parcel change. The regional folks are probably still using a fax machine or something.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
2 months ago
I agree, A is the way to go. The local government is more likely to have the most accurate and current parcel data, especially for a recent change like a subdivision.
upvoted 0 times
Cary
13 days ago
Annmarie: Definitely, it makes sense to trust the local records in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
24 days ago
User 3: Yeah, they are more likely to have updated information on recent changes like subdivisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
25 days ago
User 2: I agree, the local government usually has more accurate parcel data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylin
1 months ago
User 1: I think A is the correct option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamey
2 months ago
Option A seems like the clear choice here. If the local records show a parcel subdivision, that's more up-to-date and reliable than the regional data not having that information.
upvoted 0 times
Minna
2 months ago
User 2: Yeah, if the local records have the subdivision update, it's probably more accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, option A seems like the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amira
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option D could also be a possibility. The new subdivision surveyed in 2004 being incorporated into the local area limits in 2007 could lead to more accurate boundaries in the local data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
2 months ago
I agree with Reyes. The local records showing a subdivision update in 2007 but not included in the regional data seems like a common discrepancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
2 months ago
I think option A is more likely to have accurate parcel boundaries in the local data.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77