Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Eccouncil Exam ECSS Topic 6 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's ECSS exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 6
[All ECSS Questions]

Jacob, an attacker, targeted container technology to destroy the reputation of an organization. To achieve this, he initially compromised a single container exploiting weak network defaults, overloaded the rest of the containers in the local domain, and restricted them from providing services to legitimate users.

Identify the type of attack initiated by Jacob in the above scenario.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Terry
25 days ago
Wow, Jacob really got creative with this one! I bet he's the kind of hacker who has a secret collection of cat videos on his laptop. Anyways, I reckon the correct answer is B, a cross-container attack.
upvoted 0 times
Ahmad
6 days ago
A) Docker registry attack
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gracia
28 days ago
I don't know, guys. This seems more like a replay attack to me. Jacob compromised the network defaults and then replayed that attack to take down the rest of the containers. Option D is the way to go, in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefania
29 days ago
Haha, Jacob really went all out, didn't he? Targeting the whole container infrastructure, what a bold move! I'd say this is a clear case of option B, a cross-container attack. The guy's got some skills, I'll give him that.
upvoted 0 times
Lorita
8 days ago
Absolutely, targeting the whole container infrastructure shows some serious determination.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
11 days ago
I agree, he really went all in with that strategy. It's a dangerous game he's playing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
13 days ago
Yeah, Jacob definitely knew what he was doing. Cross-container attack is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ahmad
1 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. The question mentions that Jacob overloaded the containers and restricted them from providing services, which sounds more like a container escaping attack to me. I think C is the correct answer here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meaghan
1 months ago
Hmm, this sounds like a classic case of a cross-container attack. Jacob exploited the weak network defaults to compromise a single container and then used that foothold to target the rest of the containers in the domain. That's definitely option B.
upvoted 0 times
Definitely a cross-container attack, Jacob was strategic in targeting multiple containers within the domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
3 days ago
Cross-container attacks are dangerous because once one container is compromised, it can be used as a launching pad to target the rest. Jacob's strategy definitely falls under this category.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
7 days ago
I agree, a cross-container attack is when an attacker gains access to one container and uses it to attack others in the same domain. Jacob's actions align with this type of attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brande
10 days ago
Absolutely, a cross-container attack fits the description perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
10 days ago
Yes, you're right. Jacob's attack on the containers by compromising one and then targeting the others definitely fits the description of a cross-container attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Steffanie
1 months ago
Yes, I agree. Jacob's actions align with a cross-container attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loreta
2 months ago
I believe it could also be a Container escaping attack, as Jacob compromised a single container and then restricted the others from providing services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerri
2 months ago
I agree with Salena. Jacob targeted multiple containers in the local domain, so it seems like a Cross container attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
2 months ago
I think the attack initiated by Jacob is a Cross container attack.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77