Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

Eccouncil Exam 312-49 Topic 1 Question 46 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-49 exam

Question #: 46
Topic #: 1

[All 312-49 Questions]

You work as an IT security auditor hired by a law firm in Boston to test whether you can gain access to sensitive information about the company clients. You have rummaged through their trash and found very little information. You do not want to set off any alarms on their network, so you plan on performing passive foot printing against their Web servers. What tool should you use?

APing sweep

BNmap

CNetcraft

DDig

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Buddy at Jul 30, 2023, 05:38 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 312-49 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Scot

3 days ago

I'm going with Dig. It's a simple yet effective tool for passive DNS reconnaissance, which could be really useful in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Andra

6 days ago

Nmap seems like the obvious choice. It's a powerful tool for network scanning and can give you a lot of valuable information about the target.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jeanice

9 days ago

I'm not sure, but I think Netcraft could also be a good option for passive foot printing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ahmad

11 days ago

I agree with Helaine, Nmap is a great tool for this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Helaine

14 days ago

I think we should use Nmap for passive foot printing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Felton

15 days ago

I think Netcraft is the way to go here. It's a passive tool that can gather a ton of information about the target website without being intrusive.

upvoted 0 times

...

Minna

18 days ago

I'm not sure, but I think Netcraft could also be a good option for passive foot printing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawny

19 days ago

I agree with Cornell, Nmap is a great tool for this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cornell

23 days ago

I think we should use Nmap for passive foot printing.

upvoted 0 times

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77