Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Eccouncil Exam 312-49 Topic 1 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 312-49 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 1
[All 312-49 Questions]

Jacob is a computer forensics investigator with over 10 years of experience in investigations and has written over 50 articles on computer forensics. He has been called upon as a qualified witness to testify the accuracy and integrity of the technical log files gathered in an investigation into computer fraud. What is the term used for Jacob's testimony in this case?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Joseph
1 months ago
I bet Jacob's testimony is so dry, it could double as a desiccant. But hey, at least he's not trying to authenticate his stand-up comedy skills!
upvoted 0 times
Hyman
15 hours ago
A) Certification
upvoted 0 times
...
German
16 hours ago
D) Authentication
upvoted 0 times
...
Timmy
6 days ago
I bet Jacob's testimony is so dry, it could double as a desiccant. But hey, at least he's not trying to authenticate his stand-up comedy skills!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
8 days ago
D) Authentication
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
18 days ago
A) Certification
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
19 days ago
A) Certification
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mauricio
1 months ago
You know, I was tempted to choose C) Reiteration, because Jacob has written so many articles on the topic. But I suppose that's more about repetition, not validation. Authentication it is!
upvoted 0 times
Ariel
21 days ago
Certification wouldn't really fit in this case, so Authentication makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mendy
1 months ago
I agree, Authentication is the correct term for Jacob's testimony.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erasmo
2 months ago
Hmm, I was leaning towards B) Justification, but I guess that's more about providing a rationale for the investigation itself, not the evidence. Authentication makes the most sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
2 months ago
Yes, Authentication makes sense because Jacob is confirming the integrity of the evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
2 months ago
I agree with Gilma, Jacob's testimony is about verifying the accuracy of the technical log files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
2 months ago
I think the term is Authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
2 months ago
I agree with Carolann. Jacob's expertise and experience make his testimony an authoritative source for validating the evidence. This is the very definition of authentication.
upvoted 0 times
Noe
4 days ago
Absolutely, Jacob's testimony will help establish the accuracy of the technical log files.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yan
19 days ago
Authentication is crucial in cases like this to ensure the integrity of the evidence.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
26 days ago
Yes, I agree. Jacob's experience and expertise make his testimony very reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
1 months ago
I think the term for Jacob's testimony is Authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carolann
2 months ago
Clearly, the correct answer is D) Authentication. Jacob's testimony is crucial in verifying the accuracy and integrity of the technical log files, which is the essence of authentication in computer forensics.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
a