Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Eccouncil Exam 112-51 Topic 4 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 112-51 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 4
[All 112-51 Questions]

Jacob, an attacker, targeted container technology to destroy the reputation of an organization. To achieve this, he initially compromised a single container exploiting weak network defaults, overloaded the rest of the containers in the local domain, and restricted them from providing services to legitimate users.

Identify the type of attack initiated by Jacob in the above scenario.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Wenona
25 days ago
Wait, I thought containers were supposed to be all secure and stuff. Guess Jacob found a way to break out of the sandbox, huh? C) for the win, I reckon.
upvoted 0 times
Katheryn
4 days ago
A) Cross-container attack
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gabriele
28 days ago
Ah, the classic 'overload the containers and restrict services' move. Looks like a good old-fashioned replay attack to me. D) has my vote!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elroy
1 months ago
Hold up, did you say 'Docker registry'? That's a new one on me. But hey, if the attacker's trying to mess with the organization's reputation, B) could be the answer. Gotta protect those registries, yo!
upvoted 0 times
...
Melita
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Jacob seems to have targeted the whole container network, not just a single one. Maybe it's a cross-container attack? A) sounds like the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
Wava
4 days ago
Cross-container attack it is then, Jacob really caused some damage with that method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
13 days ago
Yeah, Jacob definitely went after multiple containers to disrupt the organization's services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
1 months ago
I think you're right, a cross-container attack makes sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alpha
2 months ago
Whoa, this sounds like a serious container breach! I'm gonna go with C) Container escaping attack. That's when an attacker gets out of the container and into the host system, right? Gotta keep those containers secure, folks!
upvoted 0 times
Alyce
1 months ago
Absolutely, container security is crucial to protect our organization's reputation and data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mi
1 months ago
We definitely need to strengthen our container security to prevent such breaches in the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
1 months ago
Yeah, Jacob really went all out with that attack, compromising the whole system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
1 months ago
I think you're right, C) Container escaping attack is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jodi
2 months ago
I see your point, Latanya. It could also be a Docker registry attack since he targeted container technology specifically.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe it is a Container escaping attack because he compromised a single container and then restricted the rest.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
2 months ago
I think the attack initiated by Jacob is a Cross-container attack.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77