Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Eccouncil Exam 112-51 Topic 1 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Eccouncil's 112-51 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 1
[All 112-51 Questions]

Identify the loT communication model that serves as an analyzer for a company to track monthly or yearly energy consumption. Using this analysis, companies can reduce the expenditure on energy.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Deterrent controls are a type of physical security controls that use warning messages and signs to notify legal consequences and discourage hackers from making intrusion attempts. Deterrent controls aim to reduce the likelihood of an attack by creating a perception of risk or fear in the potential attackers. Deterrent controls can include fences, locks, alarms, cameras, guards, or security policies12. Reference: Network Defense Essentials - EC-Council Learning, Understanding the Various Types of Physical Security Controls


by Penney at Jul 03, 2024, 05:26 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 112-51 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Coral
1 months ago
The device-to-cloud model is the way to go! I can already see the energy savings, and the cloud-based analytics are going to be a game-changer.
upvoted 0 times
Selma
6 days ago
I think the device-to-cloud model is the most efficient way to analyze energy consumption and make necessary adjustments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
17 days ago
Cloud-based analytics will definitely help companies make more informed decisions about their energy usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leoma
26 days ago
I agree, the device-to-cloud model is perfect for tracking energy consumption and reducing costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Daron
1 months ago
I'm feeling lucky, so I'm going to go with the device-to-device model. What could possibly go wrong? Oh wait, that's not how IoT works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mattie
2 months ago
Hmm, the device-to-gateway model is tempting, but I'm going to go with the device-to-cloud model. Seems like a more straightforward solution for energy tracking.
upvoted 0 times
Arthur
7 days ago
User 4: Device-to-device model might not provide the detailed analysis needed for reducing energy expenditure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilberto
10 days ago
User 3: Cloud-to-cloud model could also be a good option for analyzing energy consumption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerilyn
12 days ago
User 2: I agree, it seems like a more straightforward solution compared to the device-to-gateway model.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roy
1 months ago
User 1: I think the device-to-cloud model is the best option for tracking energy consumption.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gwenn
2 months ago
The cloud-to-cloud model is interesting, but I don't think it's the best fit for this use case. The device-to-cloud model seems more appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
Elenore
1 months ago
Yeah, the device-to-cloud model allows for better analysis and control over energy usage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
1 months ago
I agree, the device-to-cloud model would be more suitable for tracking energy consumption.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenneth
2 months ago
I think the device-to-cloud model is the correct answer here. It allows devices to directly communicate with the cloud, which is perfect for tracking energy consumption data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rana
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) Device-to-gateway model for tracking energy consumption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
2 months ago
I agree with Kirby, because the device-to-cloud model allows for data analysis and cost reduction.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirby
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) Device-to-cloud model.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77