Docker Exam DCA Topic 7 Question 69 Discussion

Actual exam question for Docker's DCA exam

Question #: 69
Topic #: 7

[All DCA Questions]

You want to mount external storage to a particular filesystem path in a

container in a Kubernetes pod.

What is the correct set of objects to use for this?

Aa persistentVolume in the pod specification, populated with a persistentVolumeClaim which is bound to a volume defined by a storageClass

Ba storageClass in the pod's specification, populated with a volume which is bound to a provisioner defined by a persistentVolume

Ca volume in the pod specification, populated with a storageClass which is bound to a provisioner defined by a persistentVolume

Da volume in the pod specification, populated with a persistentVolumeClaim bound to a persistentVolume defined by a storageClass

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Lauran at Apr 20, 2023, 12:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium DCA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Phuong

1 months ago

Wait, are we supposed to actually understand this stuff? I thought this was a test of our ability to guess randomly. Time to put my luck to the test!

upvoted 0 times

...

Veronika

1 months ago

Option D, definitely. I've used this setup before and it works like a charm. Gotta love that Kubernetes storage abstraction!

upvoted 0 times

Karan

24 hours ago

User 2: Agreed, I've used that setup before and it worked really well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Niesha

2 days ago

User 1: I think option D is the way to go for mounting external storage in a Kubernetes pod.

upvoted 0 times

...

Polly

2 months ago

Haha, this question is a real brain-teaser! Kubernetes storage management is no joke. I'm going to have to think this one through carefully.

upvoted 0 times

Nilsa

1 months ago

Kelvin: Definitely, Kubernetes storage management can be tricky but it's important to understand the correct setup for mounting external storage.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kelvin

1 months ago

User 2: That makes sense, it's important to have the persistentVolumeClaim bound to the volume defined by a storageClass.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jaleesa

1 months ago

User 1: I think the correct set of objects to use is A) a persistentVolume in the pod specification, populated with a persistentVolumeClaim which is bound to a volume defined by a storageClass.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nan

2 months ago

I don't know, Option A looks pretty good too. A persistentVolumeClaim bound to a volume defined by a storageClass seems like a valid approach.

upvoted 0 times

Izetta

1 days ago

User 2: Yeah, a persistentVolumeClaim bound to a volume defined by a storageClass makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alise

7 days ago

User 1: I think Option A is the correct one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joni

15 days ago

User 4: Let's go with Option A then, it seems like the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Earleen

18 days ago

User 3: I'm not sure, but Option A does seem like a valid approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Martha

26 days ago

User 3: I agree, that seems like the right approach for mounting external storage in a Kubernetes pod.

upvoted 0 times

...

Salena

1 months ago

User 2: Yeah, a persistentVolumeClaim bound to a volume defined by a storageClass makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Valentin

1 months ago

User 1: I think Option A is the correct one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elena

1 months ago

User 2: Yeah, using a persistentVolumeClaim bound to a volume defined by a storageClass makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Michell

1 months ago

User 1: I think Option A is the correct one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merissa

2 months ago

Option D looks correct to me. A persistentVolumeClaim bound to a persistentVolume defined by a storageClass seems like the right way to mount external storage.

upvoted 0 times

Justine

1 months ago

I agree, using a persistentVolumeClaim bound to a persistentVolume defined by a storageClass is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chu

2 months ago

Option D looks correct to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Belen

2 months ago

But wouldn't using a persistentVolume directly in the pod specification provide more flexibility and control over the storage?

upvoted 0 times

...

Diego

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe the correct set of objects to use is D) a volume in the pod specification, populated with a persistentVolumeClaim bound to a persistentVolume defined by a storageClass.

upvoted 0 times

...

Belen

2 months ago

I think the correct set of objects to use is A) a persistentVolume in the pod specification, populated with a persistentVolumeClaim which is bound to a volume defined by a storageClass.

upvoted 0 times

...