Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Dell EMC Exam E20-260 Topic 4 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Dell EMC's E20-260 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 4
[All E20-260 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

You have created a Distributed Device in a VPLEX Metro. You want to confirm the volumes before performing a mobility job within the cluster. You will be moving the device to cluster 1.

Which object will be the source for this operation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ming
11 months ago
But could it be A since only one director failed during the power disruption?
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
11 months ago
I agree with User1, it must be C because not all 'A' directors were affected.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trevor
12 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
12 months ago
I agree with Tiara. The message likely appeared because of the single director failure. Option A seems like the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
12 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
12 months ago
I don't think so. If the power disruption only affected one director, it makes more sense that it's related to that. So I still lean towards option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louisa
12 months ago
But what about option D? Could the vaulting process running on cluster-1 have caused the message?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
1 years ago
That makes sense. So option A could be the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
1 years ago
I think the message appeared because the power disruption only affected a single director.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
1 years ago
I think C is the right answer. The question says the power disruption didn't affect all 'A' directors, so the vaulting process would be impacted even though it's running on a different cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
1 years ago
Hmm, this is a tough one. I'm curious why the vaulting process would be impacted at all if it's running on a different cluster. D seems like it could be the answer, but I'm not totally confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
1 years ago
I'm not so sure. If the power disruption only affected a single director, wouldn't the vaulting process just fail over to the other director in the cluster? I'm not convinced A is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
1 years ago
I'm leaning towards A. The power disruption only affected a single director, so the vaulting process should still be able to run on the other directors in the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
1 years ago
I think the answer is probably B. The question says the power disruption only affected cluster 2, so it shouldn't have impacted the vaulting process running on cluster 1.
upvoted 0 times
Reita
11 months ago
It could be C though. The disruption might not have affected all 'A' directors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
11 months ago
I think the answer is probably B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aleshia
1 years ago
This question seems pretty straightforward, but I'm not sure about the answer. The power disruption only affected cluster 2, so I'm not sure why the vaulting process would be impacted.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77