Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Databricks Exam Databricks-Certified-Data-Analyst-Associate Topic 4 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for Databricks's Databricks Certified Data Analyst Associate Exam exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 4
[All Databricks Certified Data Analyst Associate Exam Questions]

A data analyst is processing a complex aggregation on a table with zero null values and their query returns the following result:

Which of the following queries did the analyst run to obtain the above result?

A)

B)

C)

D)

E)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The result set provided shows a combination of grouping by two columns (group_1 and group_2) with subtotals for each level of grouping and a grand total. This pattern is typical of a GROUP BY ... WITH ROLLUP operation in SQL, which provides subtotal rows and a grand total row in the result set.

Considering the query options:

A) Option A: GROUP BY group_1, group_2 INCLUDING NULL - This is not a standard SQL clause and would not result in subtotals and a grand total.

B) Option B: GROUP BY group_1, group_2 WITH ROLLUP - This would create subtotals for each unique group_1, each combination of group_1 and group_2, and a grand total, which matches the result set provided.

C) Option C: GROUP BY group_1, group 2 - This is a simple GROUP BY and would not include subtotals or a grand total.

D) Option D: GROUP BY group_1, group_2, (group_1, group_2) - This syntax is not standard and would likely result in an error or be interpreted as a simple GROUP BY, not providing the subtotals and grand total.

E) Option E: GROUP BY group_1, group_2 WITH CUBE - The WITH CUBE operation produces subtotals for all combinations of the selected columns and a grand total, which is more than what is shown in the result set.

The correct answer is Option B, which uses WITH ROLLUP to generate the subtotals for each level of grouping as well as a grand total. This matches the result set where we have subtotals for each group_1, each combination of group_1 and group_2, and the grand total where both group_1 and group_2 are NULL.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Billye
2 days ago
I think the query must have used some kind of aggregation function.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raelene
24 days ago
Haha, can you imagine if the answer was actually Option E? That would be a real head-scratcher.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
26 days ago
Wait, did anyone else notice that the table has zero null values? That's a pretty interesting detail. Maybe that's a hint?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawna
27 days ago
Personally, I'm not a big fan of these types of questions. I prefer something more straightforward, where I can just plug in the numbers and get the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
28 days ago
I'm leaning towards Option C or D. The GROUP BY and SUM functions look like they could produce the result shown in the image.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaniqua
1 months ago
Hmm, the question is asking about a complex aggregation, so I'm thinking it might be one of the more complicated-looking queries. But I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
1 months ago
This query seems pretty straightforward, but I'm not sure which one of these options is the correct answer. I'll need to take a closer look at each one.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77