Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Databricks Exam Databricks Machine Learning Associate Topic 2 Question 27 Discussion

Actual exam question for Databricks's Databricks Machine Learning Associate exam
Question #: 27
Topic #: 2
[All Databricks Machine Learning Associate Questions]

A team is developing guidelines on when to use various evaluation metrics for classification problems. The team needs to provide input on when to use the F1 score over accuracy.

Which of the following suggestions should the team include in their guidelines?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

If the new solution requires that each of the three models computes a prediction for every record, the time efficiency during inference will be reduced. This is because the inference process now involves running multiple models instead of a single model, thereby increasing the overall computation time for each record.

In scenarios where inference must be done by multiple models for each record, the latency accumulates, making the process less time efficient compared to using a single model.


Model Ensemble Techniques

Contribute your Thoughts:

Michell
1 months ago
Haha, Cyril's analogy is spot on! It's like using a speedometer to judge a Formula 1 driver's performance. The F1 score is the true measure of a model's prowess in these tricky situations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
1 months ago
Option C all the way! Accuracy is overrated - it's like asking a goalkeeper to focus on their uniform instead of the goal. The F1 score is the real MVP when it comes to imbalanced classes.
upvoted 0 times
Elsa
3 days ago
Accuracy can be misleading in those cases, so the F1 score is a better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
16 days ago
I agree, option C is definitely the way to go when dealing with imbalanced classes.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Isabelle
1 months ago
Hmm, I was thinking B, but I can see how C would be more relevant. After all, who wants a model that's great at identifying true negatives but can't spot the true positives? The F1 score keeps things balanced.
upvoted 0 times
Eric
20 days ago
Definitely, C is the way to go. It's all about finding that balance between true positives and true negatives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashunda
1 months ago
Yeah, C seems like the best choice here. Balancing the trade-off between precision and recall is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
1 months ago
I agree, C makes more sense. It's important to prioritize avoiding false negatives in certain cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hayley
2 months ago
I agree with Graciela. The F1 score gives a better sense of how the model is performing on both precision and recall, which is crucial when you've got an imbalanced dataset.
upvoted 0 times
Hannah
17 days ago
Definitely, identifying true positives and true negatives equally is key for certain business problems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
1 months ago
Agreed, the F1 score provides a good balance between precision and recall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
1 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. It's important to prioritize avoiding false negatives in such cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenor
2 months ago
Absolutely, using the F1 score is essential when dealing with imbalanced datasets.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Graciela
2 months ago
Option C seems like the best choice here. When there's a significant imbalance between positive and negative classes and avoiding false negatives is important, the F1 score is more appropriate than just looking at overall accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
Carylon
1 months ago
Yes, option C is definitely the way to go. F1 score is better suited for situations where imbalance between classes is a concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
2 months ago
I agree, option C makes sense. It's important to prioritize avoiding false negatives in such cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wei
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think option D could also be important depending on the business problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
2 months ago
I agree with Joni. Option C makes sense because avoiding false negatives is crucial in some cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
3 months ago
I think the team should include option C in their guidelines.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77