Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CyberArk Exam SECRET-SEN Topic 7 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's SECRET-SEN exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 7
[All SECRET-SEN Questions]

A customer wants to ensure applications can retrieve secrets from Conjur in three different data centers if the Conjur Leader becomes unavailable. Conjur Followers are already deployed in each of these data centers.

How should you architect the solution to support this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Galen
27 days ago
I'm all about that Option C life. AuBelenatic recovery is the way to go - no need to manually promote a Standby, that's just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
28 days ago
Option D, huh? Deploying a CP provider on the Follower server for offline caching? Sounds like a real 'cache in the clouds' kind of move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
1 months ago
No changes required? That's a bold choice, Option A. I guess the customer just wants to live life on the edge!
upvoted 0 times
...
Trina
1 months ago
I think Option B is the way to go. Deploying a Standby in each data center that can be promoted to the Leader role is a simple and straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
Jacqueline
2 days ago
Deploying a Standby in each data center for failover seems like the best way to handle the situation if the Conjur Leader goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
7 days ago
Deploying a Standby in each data center is a good strategy for ensuring applications can still retrieve secrets even if the Leader goes down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
8 days ago
I agree, Option B seems like the most practical solution for ensuring applications can retrieve secrets from Conjur in multiple data centers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
9 days ago
I agree, it's a reliable solution to have a backup Leader ready to take over if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
12 days ago
Option B is definitely the best choice. Having a Standby in each data center ensures high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evelynn
14 days ago
Option B is a good choice. Having a Standby in each data center ready to be promoted to Leader is a solid plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wade
2 months ago
Option C seems like the best solution to me. Extending the auto failover cluster to include Standby in each data center will ensure automatic recovery if the Leader becomes unavailable.
upvoted 0 times
Hoa
1 days ago
Yes, it's important to have redundancy in place to ensure applications can still retrieve secrets from Conjur in case of Leader unavailability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
3 days ago
Deploying a CP provider on the Follower server for offline caching might also be a good idea to ensure seamless access to secrets in case of any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
4 days ago
I agree, having a Standby in each data center for automatic recovery is a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
5 days ago
I agree, having Standby in each data center for automatic recovery is crucial for ensuring applications can retrieve secrets from Conjur.
upvoted 0 times
...
Muriel
18 days ago
Option C seems like the best solution to me. Extending the auto failover cluster to include Standby in each data center will ensure automatic recovery if the Leader becomes unavailable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Effie
1 months ago
Option C seems like the best solution to me. Extending the auto failover cluster to include Standby in each data center will ensure automatic recovery if the Leader becomes unavailable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lanie
2 months ago
I'm not sure about option C. I think option B might also work by deploying a Standby in each data center that can be promoted to Leader.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
2 months ago
I agree with Elke. Option C provides the most reliable solution for ensuring applications can retrieve secrets from Conjur in multiple data centers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
3 months ago
I think option C is the best choice because it ensures automatic recovery in case the Leader becomes unavailable.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77