Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

CyberArk Exam EPM-DEF Topic 2 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's EPM-DEF exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 2
[All EPM-DEF Questions]

When adding the EPM agent to a pre-existing security stack on workstation, what two steps are CyberArk recommendations. (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

by Alyssa at Aug 06, 2024, 12:54 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium EPM-DEF Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Meghann
10 months ago
I believe the correct steps are B and D, as it's important to add EPM agent to other security tools exclusions and create new advanced policies for each security tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleisha
10 months ago
B and D for sure. Can't have the EPM agent going rogue and trying to take over the whole security stack. That would be a real 'mission: impossible' situation.
upvoted 0 times
Katie
9 months ago
Agreed, it's crucial to ensure that the EPM agent integrates smoothly with the pre-existing security stack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matt
9 months ago
B and D are definitely important steps to follow. We can't risk any conflicts with the existing security tools.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elena
10 months ago
Hmm, I was thinking A and B, but D sounds like a good idea too. Gotta make sure everything plays nice together, right? Wouldn't want the EPM agent to get into a security tool turf war or something.
upvoted 0 times
Fabiola
9 months ago
D) Create new advanced policies for each security tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
9 months ago
B) Add EPM agent to the other security tools exclusions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
10 months ago
A) Add any pre-existing security application to the Files to Be Ignored Always.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hillary
10 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D could also be a valid option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
10 months ago
I'm going with B and D as well. Keeping the EPM agent separate from the other security tools and creating new policies seems like the way to go. Wouldn't want any conflicts or incompatibilities, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Lindsey
9 months ago
B and D are definitely the way to go for a smooth integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirk
9 months ago
It's better to be safe than sorry when it comes to adding the EPM agent to a pre-existing security stack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
9 months ago
Creating new policies for each security tool is a good way to avoid conflicts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
10 months ago
I agree, keeping the EPM agent separate from other security tools is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shaun
10 months ago
I agree with Erasmo, adding EPM agent to other security tools exclusions makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
10 months ago
I agree with Marsha. Option B and D make the most sense to me. Trying to run the EPM agent with no other security tools could be problematic.
upvoted 0 times
Alease
10 months ago
Creating new advanced policies for each security tool sounds like a good plan as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
10 months ago
I think adding the EPM agent to the other security tools exclusions is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marsha
10 months ago
I think the correct answers are B and D. Adding the EPM agent to the other security tools exclusions and creating new advanced policies for each security tool seems like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
Marti
10 months ago
It's essential to follow CyberArk's recommendations to ensure proper functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
10 months ago
Creating new advanced policies for each security tool is also crucial for a smooth integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherita
10 months ago
I agree, adding the EPM agent to the other security tools exclusions is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erasmo
11 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77