Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CyberArk Exam ACCESS-DEF Topic 1 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for CyberArk's ACCESS-DEF exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 1
[All ACCESS-DEF Questions]

Which statement is correct about the CyberArk Identity Windows Device Trust enrollment process?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Emogene
1 months ago
Wait, there's no option for 'none of the above'? This exam is rigged!
upvoted 0 times
Dalene
1 days ago
A) An enrollment code is optional.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shelton
2 days ago
B) The endpoint does not need to be a domain-joined machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
12 days ago
A) An enrollment code is optional.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nobuko
1 months ago
Option D is the way to go. Defining the minimum number of joinable endpoints is crucial for security.
upvoted 0 times
Gilberto
4 days ago
Defining the minimum number of joinable endpoints gives us more control over the enrollment process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Javier
5 days ago
I think it's important to have control over the number of endpoints that can be joined.
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
17 days ago
I agree, setting a minimum number of joinable endpoints is important for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viki
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the correct answer is 'all of the above'. CyberArk is always making things complicated!
upvoted 0 times
Mabel
4 days ago
C) You can define the maximum number of joinable endpoints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
5 days ago
B) The endpoint does not need to be a domain-joined machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roselle
8 days ago
A) An enrollment code is optional.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kip
2 months ago
I'm going with option B. The endpoint not needing to be domain-joined is a big plus for me.
upvoted 0 times
Lashunda
1 months ago
I agree, not having to worry about domain-joined machines simplifies things a lot.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
2 months ago
Option B is definitely a game changer. Makes the enrollment process much easier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tequila
2 months ago
I think both A and B could be correct, but I would go with B because it makes more sense in terms of flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct statement is B) The endpoint does not need to be a domain-joined machine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annett
2 months ago
Option C looks good to me. Being able to define the maximum number of joinable endpoints seems like a useful feature.
upvoted 0 times
Lynda
24 days ago
Having the option to set a maximum number of joinable endpoints gives more control over device trust enrollment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
27 days ago
It definitely adds a layer of security to be able to define the maximum number of joinable endpoints.
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
28 days ago
I think it's great that you can set a limit on how many endpoints can be enrolled.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
1 months ago
I agree, having control over the maximum number of joinable endpoints is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristin
3 months ago
I think the correct statement is A) An enrollment code is optional.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77