Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CWNP Exam CWSP-207 Topic 1 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWSP-207 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 1
[All CWSP-207 Questions]

You have been recently hired as the wireless network administrator for an organization spread across seven locations. They have deployed more than 100 APs, but they have not been managed in either an automated or manual process for more than 18 months. Given this length of time, what is one of the first things you should evaluate from a security perspective?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Tran
1 months ago
Channel widths? Are you kidding me? With that level of neglect, I'd be more worried about whether the APs are still even broadcasting on the right planet!
upvoted 0 times
Mona
2 days ago
B) The channels in use
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
18 days ago
A) The channel widths configured
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Derrick
1 months ago
Hmm, firmware revision, eh? Well, I guess the IT team there has been asleep at the wheel for the past 18 months. Sounds like they need to start by updating their coffee machine before they tackle the wireless network!
upvoted 0 times
Tyra
5 days ago
C) The VLANs in use
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
8 days ago
B) The channels in use
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
23 days ago
A) The channel widths configured
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vallie
2 months ago
The VLANs in use, hands down. Those unmanaged APs could be connected to all sorts of random VLANs, possibly even giving unauthorized users access to sensitive areas of the network. Gotta lock that down ASAP.
upvoted 0 times
Tamekia
3 days ago
True, but we should also look at the channels in use to avoid interference and optimize performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
4 days ago
I think checking the firmware revision is also important to ensure any known vulnerabilities are patched.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
9 days ago
Definitely agree, VLANs are a top priority for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Huey
2 months ago
I'd go with the channels in use. Rogue APs and interference can be a real problem, so I'd want to do a full spectrum analysis and see what's going on across the wireless environment.
upvoted 0 times
Merissa
10 days ago
C) The VLANs in use
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolene
25 days ago
B) The channels in use
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaycee
1 months ago
A) The channel widths configured
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
2 months ago
Definitely the firmware revision! With those APs left unmanaged for so long, they're probably running outdated firmware full of security vulnerabilities. Better check that first before anything else.
upvoted 0 times
Launa
1 months ago
Definitely the firmware revision! With those APs left unmanaged for so long, they're probably running outdated firmware full of security vulnerabilities. Better check that first before anything else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
1 months ago
D) The firmware revision
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
1 months ago
C) The VLANs in use
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
1 months ago
B) The channels in use
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
2 months ago
A) The channel widths configured
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reuben
2 months ago
But shouldn't we also look at the channels in use to avoid interference?
upvoted 0 times
...
Samuel
2 months ago
I agree with Marylyn, outdated firmware can pose security risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
3 months ago
I think we should evaluate the firmware revision first.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77