Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CWNP Exam CWISA-102 Topic 2 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for CWNP's CWISA-102 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 2
[All CWISA-102 Questions]

Which one of the following location tracking technologies is most energy efficient in typical implementations?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Browser Ubiquity:JavaScript has a native runtime environment within almost every modern web browser, making it the 'built-in' scripting language for web-based interfaces.

Node-RED:This IoT flow-based programming tool specifically uses JavaScript for its logic and automation functions.

Other Languages:

PHP: Primarily server-side for web applications

Python: Versatile language, used in some back-end IoT functions but not natively in browsers

R: Statistical and data analysis, not typically embedded in wireless solutions

References:

JavaScript (Browser Compatibility):Documentation of its near-universal support

Node-RED (Programming Model):Descriptions of how it uses JavaScript for node logic.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Sharen
1 months ago
Cellular? More like 'Cellularly Draining' if you ask me. I'm sticking with BLE Beacons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyda
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm thinking Wi-Fi might be the way to go. It's like the lazy cat of location tech - it just lounges around and sips energy.
upvoted 0 times
Sang
10 hours ago
I agree, Wi-Fi is a smart option for energy efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alease
2 days ago
Yeah, Wi-Fi is like the lazy cat of location tech.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
3 days ago
Wi-Fi is a good choice, it's energy efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
4 days ago
I think Wi-Fi is a good choice too. It's definitely energy efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
10 days ago
D) Wi-Fi
upvoted 0 times
...
Nenita
18 days ago
C) GPS
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
25 days ago
B) Cellular
upvoted 0 times
...
Terina
1 months ago
A) BLE Beacons
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kerry
2 months ago
GPS just screams 'battery sucker' to me. I'll pass on that one for sure.
upvoted 0 times
Barb
8 days ago
BLE Beacons are definitely the way to go for energy efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
18 days ago
I agree, GPS drains my battery too quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
1 months ago
D) Wi-Fi
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
2 months ago
A) BLE Beacons
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ben
2 months ago
I'd bet my money on BLE Beacons. Those things are like the energy sippers of the location tracking world!
upvoted 0 times
Gussie
2 months ago
Yeah, I've heard that too. They're great for conserving battery life.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
2 months ago
I agree, BLE Beacons are definitely the most energy efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vivan
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Wi-Fi might also be energy efficient in some cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
2 months ago
I agree with Santos, BLE Beacons require less power compared to GPS or Cellular.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
2 months ago
I think BLE Beacons are the most energy efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77