Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CrowdStrike Exam CCFR-201 Topic 2 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for CrowdStrike's CCFR-201 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 2
[All CCFR-201 Questions]

What does pivoting to an Event Search from a detection do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Chery
1 months ago
Wait, so pivoting to an Event Search is like a superpower that lets me see the future of all related events? Mind blown!
upvoted 0 times
Delmy
4 days ago
C) It takes you to a Process Timeline for that detection so you can see all related events
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
13 days ago
B) It takes you to the raw Insight event data and provides you with a number of Event Actions
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
17 days ago
A) It gives you the ability to search for similar events on other endpoints quickly
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viki
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards option A. Being able to quickly search for similar events on other endpoints could be really useful for understanding the scope of this issue.
upvoted 0 times
Daniel
13 days ago
I also believe option A is the most practical. It can help us determine the scope of the issue more efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
19 days ago
Agreed, having the ability to search for similar events quickly can give us a better understanding of the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarvis
1 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. It can help us find similar events on other endpoints easily.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fatima
2 months ago
Haha, option D sounds like a joke answer. Searching for specific event types within a detection? That's way too simple to be the right choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Jerry
6 days ago
User 4: I think we should consider option A or C, they both seem plausible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
13 days ago
User 3: I'm not sure, but option B also sounds like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
19 days ago
User 2: I disagree, I believe option C is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
1 months ago
User 2: I agree with you, option D does sound like a joke answer. It's too specific for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
1 months ago
User 1: I think option A is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorthy
2 months ago
User 1: I think option A is the correct choice. It makes sense to search for similar events on other endpoints quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Virgilio
2 months ago
Option C looks promising, as a Process Timeline would give me a better understanding of the related events. But I'm not sure if that's the specific functionality of pivoting to an Event Search.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maia
2 months ago
I think option B is the correct answer. It takes you to the raw Insight event data and provides you with a number of Event Actions, which is exactly what I need to investigate this detection further.
upvoted 0 times
Hillary
14 days ago
User 4: Let's try it out and see what we can find in the event data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzan
15 days ago
User 3: That sounds like the best option for investigating the detection further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
21 days ago
User 2: I agree, it takes you to the raw Insight event data and provides you with a number of Event Actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
2 months ago
User 1: I think option B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Caprice
2 months ago
I see both points. But I think it's important to have a Process Timeline for that detection so you can see all related events. So, I would choose option C as the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
2 months ago
I disagree with Elena. I believe that it takes you to the raw Insight event data and provides you with a number of Event Actions. Option B seems more logical to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
3 months ago
I think pivoting to an Event Search from a detection allows you to search for similar events on other endpoints quickly. So, I would go with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77