Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CrowdStrike Exam CCFH-202 Topic 2 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for CrowdStrike's CCFH-202 exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 2
[All CCFH-202 Questions]

Which of the following is the proper method to quantify search results, enabling a hunter to quickly sort and identify outliers?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The Linux Sensor report is where an analyst would find information about shells spawned by root, Kernel Module loads, and wget/curl usage. The Linux Sensor report is a pre-defined report that provides a summary view of selected activities on Linux hosts. It shows information such as process execution events, network connection events, file write events, etc. that occurred on Linux hosts within a specified time range. The Sensor Health report, the Sensor Policy Daily report, and the Mac Sensor report do not provide the same information.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lisbeth
1 months ago
You know, option A is great and all, but have you ever tried it with a nice glass of Chardonnay? Really brings out the nuances of the search data.
upvoted 0 times
Juliana
22 hours ago
A) Using the \'| stats count by\' command at the end of a search string in Event Search
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Krystina
1 months ago
Ooh, a Splunk question! I'm all over this. Option A is the winner - the '| stats count by' is my go-to for quantifying search results.
upvoted 0 times
Ivan
5 days ago
I prefer option B actually, using '|stats count' works well for me in quantifying search results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
8 days ago
I agree, option A is the way to go. It helps quickly sort and identify outliers.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carmelina
1 months ago
Ah, the '|eval' command, the Swiss Army knife of Splunk! But for this task, I reckon option A is the way to go. Nice and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
Elke
15 days ago
Exporting to a spreadsheet and aggregating the results might take too long, I'd stick with option A or B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
17 days ago
I think option B with the '|stats count' command could work too, it's simple and straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
24 days ago
I agree, option A with the '| stats count by' command is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Youlanda
2 months ago
Option D sounds tempting, but exporting to a spreadsheet is just too much work. I'll stick with option B - the '|stats count' command is quick and easy.
upvoted 0 times
Cecil
14 days ago
I find option D to be the most accurate method, even though it requires a bit more effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
15 days ago
I prefer option A, using the '| stats count by' command gives me more detailed information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dottie
1 months ago
I agree, option B is definitely the quickest way to quantify search results.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Celestina
2 months ago
I think option A is the way to go. The '| stats count by' command gives me a nice summary of the search results, making it easy to spot any outliers.
upvoted 0 times
Veta
2 days ago
User 4: I think option C could work too, using the eval command for more flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
9 days ago
User 3: Option B is also a good choice, it gives a simple count of the results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
19 days ago
User 2: I prefer option D, exporting to a spreadsheet works better for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, option A is the best method.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sylvia
2 months ago
I prefer exporting the results to a spreadsheet and aggregating them for better analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe using the '|stats count' command is more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenora
3 months ago
I think the proper method is using the '| stats count by' command.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77