Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CrowdStrike Exam CCFA-200 Topic 13 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for CrowdStrike's CCFA-200 exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 13
[All CCFA-200 Questions]

Contribute your Thoughts:

Fabiola
4 days ago
B is just asking for trouble. Giving the Falcon console access to more IP addresses could introduce security risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Regenia
11 days ago
C seems a bit strange. Why would analysts need to place hosts under containment? Isn't that more of an IT/security function?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfrieda
13 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think D might be the right answer. If the organization has resources that need to be accessible during containment, that could be a valid scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Ettie
7 days ago
User 1: I think D is the best scenario for adding IP addresses to the containment policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Madelyn
21 days ago
I see both points, but I think C) is also crucial for allowing new analysts to place hosts under containment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabina
23 days ago
I disagree, I believe D) is more important as it ensures resources are still accessible during containment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ona
24 days ago
I think A) is the best scenario because it allows for automation based on IP address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
29 days ago
A sounds like the most logical answer here. Automating the containment process based on IP addresses would make the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
Latrice
14 days ago
User 1: I agree, option A seems like the best choice for adding IP addresses to the containment policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77