Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA Exam PK0-005 Topic 4 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's PK0-005 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 4
[All PK0-005 Questions]

A PM is working on the preliminary scope statement and identifies that this project has the same approach as another project that was completed last year. Which of the following actions would the PM most likely perform?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

This is where an existing application that is highly utilized by clients is moving to a new release, as it involves deploying and operating it in a live environment.Reference= CompTIA Project+ Study Guide1, Chapter 4: Project Environments


Contribute your Thoughts:

Emilio
2 months ago
I'm going with D. It's the 'use and reuse' approach, and who doesn't love a good recycling project? Especially when it's not your trash to sort through.
upvoted 0 times
Cyril
3 days ago
Exactly, why reinvent the wheel when you can just tweak it?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
10 days ago
It saves time and resources to build on what already works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eve
18 days ago
Definitely, it's a practical approach to leverage past success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamala
19 days ago
It saves time and resources, and ensures consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
1 months ago
I agree, using existing artifacts is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
1 months ago
I agree, using existing artifacts is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
2 months ago
Asking the project sponsor for the previous final project report results seems like a waste of time. The PM should just use what they already have.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janet
2 months ago
But wouldn't it be helpful to call the previous PM for advice on risks and issues as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
2 months ago
I agree with Selma. It makes sense to leverage what worked well in the previous project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kasandra
2 months ago
I'd go with option D. Why reinvent the wheel when you can just adapt the existing stuff? Efficiency, people!
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
2 months ago
I think the PM should use existing artifacts and accommodate based on current project success criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
2 months ago
But wouldn't it be helpful to call the previous PM for advice on risks and issues as well?
upvoted 0 times
...
Marlon
2 months ago
Calling the previous PM for advice is a good idea, but it may not be necessary if the project approach is truly the same.
upvoted 0 times
An
28 days ago
D) Use existing artifacts and accommodate based on the current project success criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
1 months ago
A) Call the previous PM for advice on risks and issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mireya
2 months ago
I agree with Armanda. It's important to leverage what worked well in the past.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
2 months ago
Using existing artifacts and accommodating based on the current project success criteria is the most logical approach. It saves time and leverages previous learnings.
upvoted 0 times
Nickolas
30 days ago
It definitely makes sense to leverage previous project success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
1 months ago
I think using existing artifacts is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurena
1 months ago
I agree, it's efficient to build on what's already been done.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
1 months ago
That's a smart way to approach it.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Armanda
2 months ago
I think the PM should use existing artifacts and accommodate based on current project success criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77