Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA Exam DS0-001 Topic 5 Question 29 Discussion

Contribute your Thoughts:

Francis
19 days ago
3 NF, hands down! Anything higher than that just seems like overkill for most real-world database needs. But hey, at least it's not 1 NF - that would be a rookie move!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosenda
22 days ago
Hmm, 3 NF sounds right, but I wonder if 2 NF could also be a good choice in some cases. Gotta love these tricky database questions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
27 days ago
Definitely 3 NF, right? I remember learning that it's the most preferred normal form for relational databases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
1 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's 3 NF, but I'm not 100% sure. I need to review my database design concepts again.
upvoted 0 times
Latricia
4 days ago
Yeah, 3 NF is the most commonly used for database design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karon
6 days ago
I remember studying that 3 NF is the most preferable for relational database design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
15 days ago
Yeah, 3 NF is definitely the way to go for relational database design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacinta
16 days ago
I remember learning that 3 NF helps reduce data redundancy and improves data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
17 days ago
I think it's 3 NF too, it's the most commonly used for relational database design.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
24 days ago
I think it's 3 NF too, but let's double check.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nida
2 months ago
I prefer 2 NF because it ensures all attributes are fully functionally dependent on the primary key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
2 months ago
I agree with Brittni, 3 NF reduces data redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
2 months ago
I think 3 NF is the most preferable.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
a