Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA Exam DS0-001 Topic 3 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's DS0-001 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 3
[All DS0-001 Questions]

A company wants to deploy a new application that will distribute the workload to five different database instances. The database administrator needs to ensure that, for each copy of the database, users are able to read and write data that will be synchronized across all of the instances.

Which of the following should the administrator use to achieve this objective?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Pamella
1 months ago
I'm going with availability groups. It's the only option that specifically mentions synchronizing data across multiple instances. Plus, it has a cool name - makes it sound fancy and high-tech!
upvoted 0 times
Mel
8 days ago
I think availability groups is the way to go too. It sounds like the best option for keeping everything in sync.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Michael
1 months ago
Failover clustering? Hmm, I don't think that's the right approach. We need something that can distribute the workload, not just provide failover.
upvoted 0 times
Johnna
2 days ago
A: Exactly, that's what we need for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
6 days ago
B: Yeah, that makes sense. It will distribute the workload across all instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clay
16 days ago
A: I think we should use Availability groups for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candida
1 months ago
Log shipping? Really? That's more for disaster recovery, not for load distribution. I don't think that's the right solution here.
upvoted 0 times
Desiree
9 days ago
User 3: Peer-to-peer replication could also work well for distributing the workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
17 days ago
User 2: Failover clustering might be a better option to ensure data synchronization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melynda
22 days ago
User 1: I think we should use availability groups for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tricia
2 months ago
Availability groups seem like the best fit for this scenario. They provide high availability and automatic failover, which is what the company is looking for.
upvoted 0 times
Karima
9 days ago
Log shipping is not ideal for this situation since it does not provide automatic failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
16 days ago
Peer-to-peer replication could also work, but availability groups offer more features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
17 days ago
Failover clustering might not be the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janella
1 months ago
Yes, availability groups provide the necessary high availability and failover capabilities for this deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emily
1 months ago
I agree, availability groups would ensure data synchronization across all instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
1 months ago
I agree, availability groups would ensure data synchronization across all instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Filiberto
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Peer-to-peer replication could also work for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marci
2 months ago
I agree with Xuan, Availability groups would ensure data synchronization across all instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
2 months ago
I think the administrator should use Availability groups to achieve this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanda
2 months ago
Peer-to-peer replication sounds like the way to go here. Synchronizing data across multiple instances is exactly what that feature is designed for.
upvoted 0 times
Rachael
12 days ago
D: Definitely, it will ensure that data is synchronized across all instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarinda
15 days ago
C: So, we should go with peer-to-peer replication to distribute the workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
17 days ago
B: I agree, it's designed for synchronizing data across multiple instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
1 months ago
A: I think peer-to-peer replication is the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77