Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA Exam DA0-001 Topic 4 Question 44 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's DA0-001 exam
Question #: 44
Topic #: 4
[All DA0-001 Questions]

A data analyst needs to apply quality control concepts to a data set for accuracy. Which of the following is the best way to do this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lettie
1 months ago
Ah, cross-validation, the old reliable! Gotta love a good data quality check, keeps those numbers honest.
upvoted 0 times
Kina
10 days ago
Cross-validation is definitely a solid choice for data quality control.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marylin
1 months ago
Parameterization? Is this a trick question or something? That doesn't sound right at all.
upvoted 0 times
Avery
7 days ago
C: Parameterization doesn't seem like the right choice for quality control in data analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
8 days ago
B: Encryption could also be a good way to ensure accuracy in the data set.
upvoted 0 times
...
Donte
25 days ago
A: I think the best way to apply quality control concepts to a data set is through cross-validation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Misty
1 months ago
Encryption? What, are we trying to keep the data a secret from the gremlins? I don't think that's the answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Shawnee
6 days ago
User 3: Parameterization could also be a good option for accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
7 days ago
User 2: I agree, we should consider standardization or cross-validation instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zack
12 days ago
User 1: Encryption is not the way to go for quality control.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Heike
2 months ago
Standardization? I think that's more for normalizing data, not really quality control. This is a tricky one!
upvoted 0 times
Adelaide
1 months ago
Yeah, I agree. It helps to validate the model's performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
1 months ago
I think cross-validation might be the best way to ensure accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Adela
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm pretty sure cross-validation is the way to go here. Gotta make sure that data is squeaky clean!
upvoted 0 times
Enola
12 days ago
Cross-validation sounds like a solid method to ensure the data is accurate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
21 days ago
I'm not sure about parameterization, but encryption might add an extra layer of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
27 days ago
Standardization could also help ensure accuracy in the data set.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jean
1 months ago
I think cross-validation is a good choice for quality control.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marleen
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think cross-validation could also be a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbeca
2 months ago
I agree with Lizette, standardization helps ensure accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizette
2 months ago
I think the best way is to use standardization.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77