Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA Exam CS0-003 Topic 2 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's CS0-003 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 2
[All CS0-003 Questions]

A security analyst reviews a SIEM alert related to a suspicious email and wants to verify the authenticity of the message:

SPF = PASS

DKIM = FAIL

DMARC = FAIL

Which of the following did the analyst most likely discover?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step The SPF = PASS result confirms the email came from an authorized server, but DKIM = FAIL indicates the message was not properly signed with the expected DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) signature. DMARC = FAIL suggests that because DKIM failed, the overall email authentication failed. This scenario is consistent with a legitimate server sending an unsigned email.


CompTIA CySA+ All-in-One Guide (Chapter 5: Email Analysis)

CompTIA CySA+ Practice Tests (Domain 1.3 Email Authentication)

Contribute your Thoughts:

Bobbye
2 months ago
You know, I bet the analyst was just sitting there, staring at the screen, wondering if they should call the IT guy or order a pizza. Option B is the winner, but I could go for a slice right about now.
upvoted 0 times
Kerry
8 days ago
I wonder if the IT guy likes pizza too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
27 days ago
Definitely, a slice would hit the spot right now.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
1 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense. Maybe they should order that pizza after all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
1 months ago
I think the message was sent from an authorized mail server but was not signed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonida
2 months ago
Haha, the analyst must have been like, 'Wait, is this a real alert or just a prank?' Option B is the way to go, but where's the fun in that?
upvoted 0 times
Chaya
22 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that sounds like the most likely scenario. The analyst must have been relieved!
upvoted 0 times
...
Quiana
1 months ago
User 1: I think the email was sent from an authorized server but wasn't signed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lazaro
2 months ago
Alright, let's see... SPF passes, DKIM fails, DMARC fails. Sounds like an authorized server but a missing signature. Option B it is!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
2 months ago
Oh man, I bet the analyst was sweating bullets trying to figure this one out. Option B seems like the clear choice, but you never know with these tricky security questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
2 months ago
You know, I bet the security analyst is kicking themselves for not double-checking the email logs. Option D is probably the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marva
2 months ago
I believe the answer is B, as SPF passing and DKIM/DMARC failing points to lack of proper email authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearline
2 months ago
Could it be that the email security software did not process all of the records correctly?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tashia
2 months ago
Hmm, if the SPF passed but the DKIM and DMARC failed, it seems like the message was sent from an authorized server but not properly signed. Option B seems the most likely.
upvoted 0 times
Rosina
22 days ago
Option B is definitely the most likely scenario in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
1 months ago
So, the analyst most likely discovered that the message was sent from an authorized mail server but was not signed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
1 months ago
Yeah, that's why the SPF passed but the DKIM and DMARC failed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
2 months ago
I agree, it does seem like the message was sent from an authorized server but not properly signed.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Devora
2 months ago
I agree with Lavina, DKIM and DMARC failing indicates lack of proper email signing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
2 months ago
I think the analyst discovered that the message was sent from an authorized mail server but was not signed.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77