Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA Exam CAS-004 Topic 1 Question 33 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's CAS-004 exam
Question #: 33
Topic #: 1
[All CAS-004 Questions]

Which of the following is the MOST important security objective when applying cryptography to control messages that tell an ICS how much electrical power to output?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

When drafting an agreement between two companies, it is important to clearly define the responsibilities of each party. This is particularly relevant when a software company is looking to integrate with an established product. A shared responsibility agreement ensures that both parties understand their respective responsibilities and are able to work together efficiently and effectively. For example, the software company might be responsible for integrating the product and ensuring it meets user needs, while the established product provider might be responsible for providing ongoing support and maintenance. By outlining these responsibilities in the agreement, both parties can ensure that the platform is built and maintained successfully. Reference: CompTIA Advanced Security Practitioner (CASP+) Study Guide, Chapter 8, Working with Third Parties.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Soledad
1 months ago
Forget the exam, I just want to know how to hack the ICS and make it output more power. Think of the electric bills I could save!
upvoted 0 times
Jeannetta
7 days ago
A) Importing the availability of messages
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Audry
1 months ago
Integrity all the way. Imagine if someone could just spoof the messages and have the ICS pump out way too much power. That's a recipe for a major disaster!
upvoted 0 times
Loise
2 days ago
C) Enforcing protocol conformance for messages
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarina
3 days ago
D) Assuring the integrity of messages
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
6 days ago
B) Ensuring non-repudiation of messages
upvoted 0 times
...
Halina
25 days ago
C) Enforcing protocol conformance for messages
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
29 days ago
B) Ensuring non-repudiation of messages
upvoted 0 times
...
France
1 months ago
A) Importing the availability of messages
upvoted 0 times
...
Alva
1 months ago
A) Importing the availability of messages
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nichelle
1 months ago
Haha, non-repudiation? Who cares if the person who sent the message denies it, as long as the message itself is legit and the ICS follows it correctly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
1 months ago
I'm going with option D. Assuring the integrity of those messages is crucial - we can't have someone hijacking the system and telling the ICS to output the wrong power levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
2 months ago
I believe enforcing protocol conformance for messages is also important to prevent unauthorized access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
2 months ago
I agree with Gussie, ensuring the integrity of messages is crucial for controlling electrical power output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruth
2 months ago
Integrity of messages is definitely the most important security objective here. Controlling the power output of an ICS is critical, so we need to ensure the messages telling it what to do haven't been tampered with.
upvoted 0 times
Tyra
1 months ago
User 2: Definitely, we can't have any tampering with those messages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glen
1 months ago
D) Assuring the integrity of messages
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
1 months ago
C) Enforcing protocol conformance for messages
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
1 months ago
B) Ensuring non-repudiation of messages
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, ensuring the integrity of messages is crucial for controlling power output.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolande
2 months ago
A) Importing the availability of messages
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gussie
2 months ago
I think the most important security objective is assuring the integrity of messages.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77