Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25

- Free Preparation Discussions

CompTIA Exam 220-1101 Topic 1 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for CompTIA's 220-1101 exam

Question #: 32
Topic #: 1

[All 220-1101 Questions]

A technician recently received a written warning for causing a system-wide outage. The outage was a result of an unscheduled patch being manually pushed during production hours. Which of the following could have MOST likely prevented the technician from receiving the warning?

AFollowing corporate procedures

BTesting before deployment

CDocumenting the findings

DEstablishing a plan of action

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

To terminate an RJ45 port, a technician should use a punchdown tool. This tool is specifically designed to insert and cut (terminate) the wires into a patch panel, keystone jack, or a network surface mount box. The punchdown tool ensures that the wire is properly seated in the terminal block and that the connection is secure. It also trims the excess wire during the termination process, which is not a function that cable testers, toner probes, or cable strippers are designed to perform.

CompTIA A+ Certification Core 1 220-1101 study materials and learning resources1.

Networking tools and best practices for hardware and device management as covered in the CompTIA A+ certification guidelines

by Stephaine at May 21, 2024, 11:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 220-1101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Sherly

1 months ago

I'd have to say D. Establishing a clear plan of action would have helped the technician respond more effectively to the issue.

upvoted 0 times

Christoper

2 days ago

A) Following corporate procedures

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Alfreda

1 months ago

Haha, I bet the technician was like, 'I didn't know that button would blow up the whole system!' B is the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Bea

17 days ago

C) Documenting the findings

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronnie

23 days ago

B) Testing before deployment

upvoted 0 times

...

Johanna

26 days ago

A) Following corporate procedures

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Anjelica

1 months ago

I'm going with A. Following corporate procedures is the best way to prevent these kinds of incidents in the first place.

upvoted 0 times

Theresia

12 days ago

C) Documenting the findings

upvoted 0 times

...

Santos

18 days ago

B) Testing before deployment

upvoted 0 times

...

Venita

1 months ago

A) Following corporate procedures

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Maurine

2 months ago

Definitely B. If the technician had tested the patch first, they could have identified the problem and avoided the outage.

upvoted 0 times

Ernestine

3 days ago

B) Testing before deployment

upvoted 0 times

...

Darrin

1 months ago

A) Following corporate procedures

upvoted 0 times

...

...

Karon

2 months ago

I think the answer is B. Testing before deployment is crucial to catch any issues before they impact production.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cathrine

2 months ago

Definitely. Testing before deployment could have also prevented the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margurite

2 months ago

Yeah, it was a big mistake. They should have followed corporate procedures.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cathrine

2 months ago

I can't believe the technician got a warning for that outage.

upvoted 0 times

...

az-700 pass4success az-104 200-301 200-201 cissp 350-401 350-201 350-501 350-601 350-801 350-901 az-720 az-305 pl-300

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77