Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

CIW Exam 1D0-541 Topic 2 Question 86 Discussion

Actual exam question for CIW's 1D0-541 exam
Question #: 86
Topic #: 2
[All 1D0-541 Questions]

Consider the Dept1_Parts and Dept2_Parts relations shown in the exhibit. Which of the

following SQL statements would create an intersection of the two relations with the widest variety

of Structured Query Language dialects?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Laura
22 days ago
I'm going with Option D. It's the simplest and most straightforward approach. Plus, it reminds me of that classic joke: 'Why did the SQL statement cross the road? To get to the other SIDE condition!'
upvoted 0 times
Jacinta
6 days ago
I think Option D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fidelia
1 months ago
Option A? Really? Combining a SELECT with an AND operator? That's not valid SQL syntax, is it? Looks like a trick question to me.
upvoted 0 times
Sena
12 days ago
Yeah, I agree. Option B is the right choice for creating an intersection of the two relations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
25 days ago
No, Option A is definitely not valid SQL syntax. It's a trick question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
1 months ago
I think option B is the correct one. It uses the INTERSECTION keyword to find the common records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
1 months ago
No, option A is definitely not valid SQL syntax. It's a trick question.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fernanda
2 months ago
Hmm, I don't know. Option C looks like it might have a typo. Shouldn't it be `Dept1_Parts.Part_ID = Dept2_Parts.Part_ID` instead of the other way around?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Option D seems more portable to me. The WHERE clause with the equality comparison is a more basic SQL construct that should work across a wider range of database systems.
upvoted 0 times
Thersa
1 months ago
It might be more efficient, but it may not be supported by all SQL dialects. Option D is a safer choice for wider compatibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
2 months ago
But what about Option B? Wouldn't using the INTERSECTION keyword be more efficient?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sabra
2 months ago
I agree, the WHERE clause with the equality comparison is a safer bet for compatibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarence
2 months ago
Option D is definitely more portable. It's a basic SQL construct that should work on many systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sue
2 months ago
Option B looks like the way to go. The INTERSECTION keyword is supported by most SQL dialects, including SQL Server, Oracle, and PostgreSQL.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
2 months ago
Why do you think C is the correct answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronique
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diane
2 months ago
I think the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77