Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Citrix Exam 1Y0-403 Topic 9 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-403 exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 9
[All 1Y0-403 Questions]

Scenario: A Citrix Architect is redesigning a Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops environment to include Machine Creation Services (MCS). During design discussions, the locations for the MCS-provisioned thin clone machine disks are proposed as shown in the exhibit.

Click the Exhibit button to view the details.

Which two potential issues should the architect address with the customer before proceeding with this configuration? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Eva
29 days ago
This question is really cooking up some interesting discussion. I wonder if the architect has considered using a pressure cooker to speed up the machine provisioning process?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
1 months ago
I'm just hoping they don't store the machines in the same shared location as the cafeteria's lunch leftovers. That would be a real disaster!
upvoted 0 times
Eden
6 days ago
User 3: It might also lead to substantial read IOPS during updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
7 days ago
User 2: That could cause issues with write IOPS to the storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teresita
13 days ago
User 1: I heard they want to store the machines in a shared location.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Corazon
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure Option A is a real issue. I thought MCS worked with various hypervisors these days. But Option E could be a problem if we need to allocate more storage on the VM hosts.
upvoted 0 times
Zoila
11 days ago
I agree, Option E could definitely be a concern if we have to allocate more storage on the VM hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katina
2 months ago
I agree with Keena, but Option D is also a valid concern. The read IOPS required during machine creation and updates could be a bottleneck.
upvoted 0 times
Rasheeda
3 days ago
We should definitely discuss these concerns with the customer before proceeding with the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
4 days ago
I agree with both points. The read IOPS during machine creation and updates could also be a bottleneck.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
5 days ago
Yes, that could be a problem. We also need to consider the substantial write IOPS to shared storage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicia
9 days ago
I think we should address the potential issue of limited hypervisors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
20 days ago
Definitely, it's important to ensure the environment can handle the storage requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
25 days ago
Agreed, both Option B and Option D are important factors to address with the customer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
26 days ago
I think we should also consider Option B. Substantial write IOPS to the shared storage location could be an issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
26 days ago
Yes, that could be a concern. We should also consider the read IOPS during machine creation and updates.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ligia
1 months ago
I agree, the write IOPS to the shared storage location could be substantial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dwight
1 months ago
Option D is definitely a valid concern. The read IOPS could be a bottleneck.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
1 months ago
I think we should address the potential issues with the customer before proceeding.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Keena
2 months ago
Option B seems to be the most concerning issue here. The substantial write IOPS to the shared storage location could significantly impact performance and user experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
2 months ago
I believe we should also consider the need for more storage on VM hosts compared to other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
3 months ago
I agree with Nina. It could impact performance if not addressed properly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nina
3 months ago
I think the potential issue with substantial write IOPS to shared storage is a concern.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77