Citrix Exam 1Y0-403 Topic 9 Question 104 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-403 exam

Question #: 104
Topic #: 9

Scenario: An additional zone was recently added to a Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops environment. The main zone is located in New York City, and a small, second zone is located in Tokyo. Within the next year, the number of users in Tokyo is expected to equal that in New York City.

A Citrix Architect recommended the addition of 2 StoreFront servers in Tokyo to support the users.

What should the architect recommend for this environment to ensure user-experience consistency and reduce WAN bandwidth consumption?

AAdd 2 StoreFront servers to separate server groups and configure subscription synchronization

BAdd 2 StoreFront servers and configure the Optimal Gateway routing feature

CAdd 2 standalone StoreFront servers

DAdd 2 StoreFront servers to the same server group

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Shakira at Dec 09, 2024, 09:48 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 1Y0-403 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Tiara

3 months ago

D, all the way. Anything else is just overkill and makes things more complicated than they need to be. Keep it simple, right?

upvoted 0 times

Kaitlyn

3 months ago

Yeah, I think D is the way to go. It's important to prioritize simplicity in these situations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Susana

3 months ago

I see your point, but having separate server groups could add unnecessary complexity. D still seems like the most straightforward option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Augustine

3 months ago

But wouldn't it be better to have separate server groups for redundancy? A might be a good choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luke

3 months ago

I agree, keeping it simple is key. D sounds like the best option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Caitlin

4 months ago

Haha, I bet the architect who recommended this is regretting it now. Gotta love those curveball questions! I'm going with D, though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Darrel

4 months ago

C? Really? Standalone servers? That's just creating more complexity than necessary. D is clearly the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

Viola

3 months ago

D is the best choice for user-experience consistency and reducing WAN bandwidth consumption.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dominga

3 months ago

Yeah, having the StoreFront servers in the same group would definitely simplify things.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dwight

3 months ago

I agree, D seems like the most efficient option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dan

4 months ago

That's a good point, but I still think option B would be more efficient in reducing WAN bandwidth consumption.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kelvin

4 months ago

B looks good to me. Optimal Gateway routing will ensure users are directed to the closest StoreFront server, reducing WAN bandwidth.

upvoted 0 times

Chuck

3 months ago

Agreed, it will improve user experience by directing them to the closest server.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janna

4 months ago

That sounds like a good idea. It will definitely help with reducing WAN bandwidth.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leana

4 months ago

B) Add 2 StoreFront servers and configure the Optimal Gateway routing feature

upvoted 0 times

...

Haley

4 months ago

Hmm, I think the answer is D. Adding the StoreFront servers to the same server group just makes sense for load balancing and user experience consistency.

upvoted 0 times

Delmy

3 months ago

True, it's important to consider both load balancing and WAN bandwidth consumption in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Charolette

3 months ago

That's a good point, maybe having them in separate groups would be more efficient for WAN bandwidth consumption.

upvoted 0 times

...

Effie

3 months ago

But wouldn't it be better to have them in separate server groups for subscription synchronization?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jolene

3 months ago

I agree, having the StoreFront servers in the same group will definitely help with load balancing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ben

4 months ago

But wouldn't having separate server groups with option A provide better redundancy and load balancing?

upvoted 0 times

...

Dan

5 months ago

I disagree, I believe option B is better as it utilizes the Optimal Gateway routing feature.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ben

5 months ago

I think option A is the best choice because it allows for subscription synchronization.

upvoted 0 times

...