Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Citrix Exam 1Y0-341 Topic 9 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-341 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 9
[All 1Y0-341 Questions]

Scenario: During application troubleshooting, a Citrix Engineer notices that response traffic received from a protected web application is NOT matching what the web server is sending out. The engineer is concerned that someone is trying to disrupt caching behavior.

Which action is the Citrix Web App Firewall performing that would trigger this false positive?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Bulah
1 months ago
Maybe the Citrix Web App Firewall is just playing a game of 'spot the difference' with the web server's responses. Gotta keep those engineers on their toes, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Vashti
3 days ago
User 3: It's like a game of 'spot the difference' for the engineers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
6 days ago
User 2: That could be causing the mismatch in response traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawny
18 days ago
User 1: Maybe the firewall is removing the Last-Modified header.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catalina
1 months ago
I bet the Citrix Web App Firewall is removing the Last-Modified header to keep the web server from caching the response. That seems like the most likely culprit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
2 months ago
Wait, are we sure the Citrix Web App Firewall is not just adding a hidden form field to the response? Seems like a sneaky way to mess with caching, if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
Linwood
6 days ago
User 3: Maybe it's actually inserting a hidden form field to disrupt caching behavior. That would be a sneaky move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
9 days ago
User 2: That could definitely be causing the mismatch in response traffic. It's worth looking into.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
14 days ago
User 1: I think the Citrix Web App Firewall might be modifying and adding cookies in the response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terrilyn
16 days ago
That's a good point, it could be trying to disrupt caching behavior that way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
1 months ago
But what if it's actually modifying and adding cookies in the response?
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
1 months ago
I think it could be inserting a hidden form field.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carrol
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I'm pretty sure the Citrix Web App Firewall is adding cookies to the response to monitor traffic. That's the only option that seems relevant to the scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Removing the Accept-Encoding header could also trigger the false positive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dallas
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe it could be A) Removing the Last-Modified header.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
2 months ago
I think the answer is D) Modifying and adding cookies in the response.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
2 months ago
Hmm, I think the Citrix Web App Firewall is removing the Accept-Encoding header to prevent caching issues. That seems like the most logical answer here.
upvoted 0 times
Denny
16 days ago
I think removing the Last-Modified header could be another action causing the mismatch in response traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Providencia
20 days ago
True, inserting a hidden form field might also trigger a false positive in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
1 months ago
But what about modifying and adding cookies in the response? That could also disrupt caching behavior.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
1 months ago
I agree, removing the Accept-Encoding header could definitely cause issues with caching.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carmen
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think C) Removing the Accept-Encoding header could also trigger the false positive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulina
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) Removing the Last-Modified header.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
3 months ago
I think the answer is D) Modifying and adding cookies in the response.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77