Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Citrix Exam 1Y0-241 Topic 6 Question 92 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-241 exam
Question #: 92
Topic #: 6
[All 1Y0-241 Questions]

Scenario: A Citrix Administrator is concerned about the number of health checks the Citrix ADC is sending to backend resources. The administrator wants to find a way to remove health checks from specific bound services.

How can the administrator accomplish this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Josephine
2 months ago
Option B - 'no-monitor' sounds like the easy button, but I bet it comes with some caveats. Better read the fine print!
upvoted 0 times
Krystal
10 days ago
User 3: I would probably go with option A just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
11 days ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. It's always important to check for any potential drawbacks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
22 days ago
User 1: I think option B sounds too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Walton
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option B, but part of me wants to just unbind the entire monitor and start fresh. Is that too aggressive? *scratches head*
upvoted 0 times
Belen
6 days ago
Using service groups to minimize health checks could also be a good approach. It's important to find the best solution for your specific situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
8 days ago
I think unbinding the current monitor could work too. It's worth considering all options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
1 months ago
Option B sounds like a good idea. It might be less risky than unbinding the entire monitor.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chantay
2 months ago
Reverse-condition monitoring in Option D is intriguing, but I've never used that feature before. I'll need to research how it works to see if it's the best fit.
upvoted 0 times
Nohemi
2 days ago
Let's look into it and see if it's the right solution for our concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
3 days ago
I agree, it's always best to fully understand a feature before implementing it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theola
6 days ago
I think we should research more about it before making any changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
2 months ago
Option D sounds interesting, I wonder how reverse-condition monitoring works.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lanie
2 months ago
I believe using service groups to minimize health checks could also be a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
2 months ago
Service groups in Option C seem like they could help, but I wonder if that would add complexity to the setup. I'd like to understand the trade-offs before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
Elvis
1 months ago
That's true, using the no-monitor option could be a more straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
1 months ago
Unbinding the current monitor could be a simpler solution to reduce health checks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mila
1 months ago
I agree, it's important to weigh the trade-offs before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 months ago
I think unbinding the current monitor might be a simpler solution to reduce the health checks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tarra
2 months ago
Service groups can definitely help reduce the number of health checks, but it's important to weigh the added complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilford
2 months ago
Option C could help minimize health checks, but it might add complexity to the setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Amira
3 months ago
Option B sounds good, but I'm not sure if it will completely remove the health checks. I should double-check the documentation to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
3 months ago
I agree with Domonique, unbinding the current monitor seems like the right option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domonique
3 months ago
I think the administrator can unbind the current monitor.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
a