Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Citrix Exam 1Y0-241 Topic 10 Question 94 Discussion

Actual exam question for Citrix's 1Y0-241 exam
Question #: 94
Topic #: 10
[All 1Y0-241 Questions]

Scenario: While performing a disaster recovery test, a Citrix Administrator decides to failover the Citrix ADC high availability (HA) pair appliances. The administrator notices that the failover is NOT working as expected, and the secondary Citrix ADC is NOT taking over as primary. The administrator suspects that networking issues may be causing the failure.

What could be the cause of this issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Caren
13 hours ago
Hmm, this question is giving me a headache. I'm going to have to go with the old reliable 'all of the above' approach. That's my final answer, and I'm sticking to it!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dell
3 days ago
I'm gonna have to agree with Skye on this one. Option C seems like the most likely cause. Networking issues can be a real pain, especially when it comes to Citrix ADC HA.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
8 days ago
Oh man, this is a tough one. I'm gonna have to go with option D - the HA heartbeats are only seen on some enabled interfaces of the secondary node. That sounds like it could be the root of the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
10 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think option B might be the culprit. The Independent Network Configuration (INC) mode being enabled on the primary node could definitely mess up the failover process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
17 days ago
I'm not sure, but I think option D could also be a possible cause. HA heartbeats not seen on all interfaces could be a problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
18 days ago
Huh, this is tricky! I'm going to go with option C - HA monitoring is enabled on a disabled interface of the primary node. That sounds like it could cause some major issues with the failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
19 days ago
I agree with Freeman, option A seems like the most likely cause of the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freeman
21 days ago
I think the cause could be option A, HA monitoring enabled on a down interface.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77