Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Cisco Exam 700-150 Topic 4 Question 83 Discussion

Actual exam question for Cisco's 700-150 exam
Question #: 83
Topic #: 4
[All 700-150 Questions]

Security attacks are stealthier than ever. Pervasive protection is needed. When should it be implemented?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Mona at Mar 08, 2024, 01:57 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium 700-150 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Annita
1 months ago
Hmm, let's see. Attack before, during, or after? I'm gonna have to go with 'all of the above' on this one. Better safe than sorry, am I right? This question is really making my head spin.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
1 months ago
Okay, let's think this through. If I'm being attacked, I sure as heck don't want to wait until it's happening to try and protect myself. Gotta go with D - before the attack. Proactive is the way to be!
upvoted 0 times
Leanna
20 hours ago
User 3: I think waiting until after the attack is too risky. D is the best option for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
19 days ago
User 2: Definitely, prevention is better than cure. D is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
20 days ago
User 1: I agree, being proactive is key. Gotta go with D - before the attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Santos
1 months ago
Seriously, who waits for the attack to happen before doing anything? That's like waiting for the house to burn down before buying a fire extinguisher. Definitely going with D - before the attack.
upvoted 0 times
Timothy
5 days ago
Waiting for an attack to occur is risky. It's important to have security measures in place before any potential threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serita
8 days ago
Definitely, prevention is always better than cure. Implementing security measures beforehand is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erick
9 days ago
I agree, being proactive is key. It's better to be prepared in advance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Delmy
2 months ago
Hmm, pervasive protection sounds like a fancy way of saying 'always be prepared'. I guess the answer is D - before the attack. Gotta stay one step ahead of those sneaky hackers!
upvoted 0 times
Cristal
12 days ago
Being prepared is half the battle when it comes to security threats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
15 days ago
Definitely, it's better to prevent an attack than to deal with the aftermath.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
2 months ago
I agree, being proactive is key when it comes to security.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Temeka
2 months ago
I believe implementing pervasive protection during the attack could also be beneficial to minimize the damage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
3 months ago
I agree with Tamra. It's better to be proactive and prevent the attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
3 months ago
I think pervasive protection should be implemented before the attack.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77